Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35091204›Full record

ReviewRespiratory medicine2022

Cough desensitization treatment: A randomized, sham-controlled pilot trial for patients with refractory chronic cough.

Laurie Slovarp, Jane E Reynolds, Emma Bozarth-Dailey, Sarah Popp, Sarah Campbell, Paige Morkrid

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Respiratory medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06960759 (Mechanisms of Change in Behavioral Cough Suppression Therapy for Refractory Chronic Cough), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06960759 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Mechanisms of Change in Behavioral Cough Suppression Therapy for Refractory Chronic Cough

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MontanaRan2026 to 2030Enrolled135ConditionsChronic Cough (CC), Refractory Chronic Cough, Unexplained Chronic CoughArmsBCS+inactive, BCS+active
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. State of the Art for Refractory Cough: Multidisciplinary Approach.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laurie SlovarpSchool of Speech, Language, Hearing, & Occupational Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Dr., Missoula, MT, USA. Electronic address: laurie.slovarp@umontana.edu.
Jane E ReynoldsSchool of Speech, Language, Hearing, & Occupational Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Dr., Missoula, MT, USA.
Emma Bozarth-DaileySchool of Speech, Language, Hearing, & Occupational Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Dr., Missoula, MT, USA.
Sarah PoppSchool of Speech, Language, Hearing, & Occupational Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Dr., Missoula, MT, USA.
Sarah CampbellSchool of Speech, Language, Hearing, & Occupational Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Dr., Missoula, MT, USA.
Paige MorkridSchool of Speech, Language, Hearing, & Occupational Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Dr., Missoula, MT, USA.
University of Montana · US

Funding

Research Core (Developmental Research Project Program)P20GM103474 · NIGMS · MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - BOZEMAN · PI Jeffrey Good · 2012 to 2026
$60.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103474
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to determine feasibility of treating refractory chronic cough (RCC) with progressive doses of capsaicin paired with cough suppression.

methodsIn this sham-controlled, parallel RCT, 14 adults with RCC were randomly assigned to either behavioral cough suppression therapy (BCST) plus 6 treatment sessions involving exposure to nebulized capsaicin in progressively larger concentrations while actively suppressing cough (n = 8), or BCST plus 6 sessions of exposure to a single subthreshold dose of capsaicin (sham; n = 6). The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) was the primary outcome measure. Urge-to-cough (UTC) testing, measuring both UTC and cough frequency, served as secondary outcome measures. Data was analyzed with mixed effects linear regression and follow-up contrasts.

resultsResults on all measures favored the treatment group; however, there was only strong evidence of a difference in treatment effect on cough frequency during UTC testing. Mean change in LCQ at 3-weeks post treatment was 2.95 and 1.75 (p = .23), in the treatment and sham groups, respectively. Cough frequency during UTC testing reduced by 97% and 56% (p < .0001) at three weeks post, respectively. Within-group comparisons revealed strong evidence of change in the treatment group (p < .001) and moderate evidence of a change in the sham group (p = .08) in LCQ.

conclusionsConclusions from this study are limited due to the very small sample size; however, the study provides feasibility and proof-of-concept evidence to support further investigation of treating RCC with repeated exposure to nebulized capsaicin paired with BCST.

Indexed as

CoughAdultChronic DiseaseHumansPilot ProjectsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeCapsaicinChronic coughCough hypersensitivityCough suppressionDesensitizationRefractory chronic cough

Identifiers

PMID35091204
PMCPMC8881373
OpenAlexW4206233648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.