ReviewRespiratory medicine2022
Cough desensitization treatment: A randomized, sham-controlled pilot trial for patients with refractory chronic cough.
Review in Respiratory medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06960759 (Mechanisms of Change in Behavioral Cough Suppression Therapy for Refractory Chronic Cough), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Mechanisms of Change in Behavioral Cough Suppression Therapy for Refractory Chronic Cough
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of behavioural speech therapy on postoperative cough and cough-related quality of life of lung cancer patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery: A prospective randomized controlled study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Trial
- Cough desensitization treatment for patients with refractory chronic cough: results of a second pilot randomized control trial.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Trial
- Characterization of Ethyl Butyrate-Induced Cough Before and After Breath Control Techniques in Healthy Adults.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2023Trial
- Diagnosis and Treatment of Refractory Chronic Cough: An American Broncho-Esophagological Association Expert Consensus Statement.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- The central regulatory network of cough: a cornerstone of cough management.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Review
- The Effect of Attentional Manipulation on Cough Reflex Sensitivity in Individuals with Refractory Chronic Cough and Healthy Controls.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- State of the Art for Refractory Cough: Multidisciplinary Approach.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2023Article
- Cross-country skiers often experience respiratory symptoms during and after exercise but have a low prevalence of prolonged cough.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to determine feasibility of treating refractory chronic cough (RCC) with progressive doses of capsaicin paired with cough suppression.
methodsIn this sham-controlled, parallel RCT, 14 adults with RCC were randomly assigned to either behavioral cough suppression therapy (BCST) plus 6 treatment sessions involving exposure to nebulized capsaicin in progressively larger concentrations while actively suppressing cough (n = 8), or BCST plus 6 sessions of exposure to a single subthreshold dose of capsaicin (sham; n = 6). The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) was the primary outcome measure. Urge-to-cough (UTC) testing, measuring both UTC and cough frequency, served as secondary outcome measures. Data was analyzed with mixed effects linear regression and follow-up contrasts.
resultsResults on all measures favored the treatment group; however, there was only strong evidence of a difference in treatment effect on cough frequency during UTC testing. Mean change in LCQ at 3-weeks post treatment was 2.95 and 1.75 (p = .23), in the treatment and sham groups, respectively. Cough frequency during UTC testing reduced by 97% and 56% (p < .0001) at three weeks post, respectively. Within-group comparisons revealed strong evidence of change in the treatment group (p < .001) and moderate evidence of a change in the sham group (p = .08) in LCQ.
conclusionsConclusions from this study are limited due to the very small sample size; however, the study provides feasibility and proof-of-concept evidence to support further investigation of treating RCC with repeated exposure to nebulized capsaicin paired with BCST.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.