Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35090798›Full record

ArticleIntensive & critical care nursing2022

Experiences of nurses with an innovative digital diary intervention in the intensive care unit: A qualitative exploration.

Tineke Haakma, Rob Tieben, Brenda Sleven, Marc Buise, Margo van Mol

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive & critical care nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Ways of supporting relatives in intensive care units : Overview and update].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tineke HaakmaErasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Intensive Care Adults, The Netherlands. Electronic address: t.haakma@erasmusmc.nl.
Rob TiebenGames for Health (Game Solutions Lab), Eindhoven, The Netherlands. Electronic address: rob@gamesolutionslab.com.
Brenda SlevenCatharina Hospital Eindhoven, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, The Netherlands. Electronic address: brendasleven@gmail.com.
Marc BuiseCatharina Hospital Eindhoven, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, The Netherlands. Electronic address: marc.buise@catharinaziekenhuis.nl.
Margo van MolErasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Intensive Care Adults, The Netherlands. Electronic address: m.vanmol@erasmusmc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDiaries have been used regularly in various intensive care units (ICUs) in international settings. Hard copy diaries written by relatives became impractical during the COVID-19 pandemic due to ICU visiting restrictions and infection control considerations. The implementation of a web based application, named the "Post-ICU" diary, offered relatives the ability to collaboratively write in a digital diary, to easily upload photos, video and audio clips and to feel engaged with the patient at a safe distance. In addition it allowed nurses to easily provide up-to-date information. The aim of this pilot study was to explore the experiences of ICU nurses with the implementation process and application of the Post-ICU diary.

methodsA multicentre qualitative design with focus group interviews was used with ICU nurses in November 2020. Interview data were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim, and then a thematic analysis was performed to categorize the data.

resultsParticipants from three hospitals (n = 14), 57% of whom were women, with a mean age of 40.6 years, described their experiences with the Post-ICU diary. The following themes emerged: implementation process, COVID-19, integration, and motivation. The results showed that ICU nurses perceived the Post-ICU diary to be applicable in daily care and endorsed the added value of the digital Post-ICU diary as a new opportunity to improve interhuman connectedness. However, the nurses also experienced barriers such as non-user-friendly access, lack of time and hesitance to write short messages.

conclusionICU nurses reported that the Post-ICU diary had added value for patients and their relatives. However, in the beginning they also experienced barriers such as lack of time, insufficient integration with their own work processes, and challenges regarding writing short messages themselves. For structural embedding of the intervention, tailored strategies are needed to support ICU nurses in using this innovative Post-ICU diary.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAdultCritical CareFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMalePilot ProjectsWritingCOVID-19DiaryDigital innovationIntensive care unitNursesPICSPICS-FPost-ICU diaryPost Intensive Care SyndromeRelatives

Identifiers

PMID35090798
PMCPMC9561682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.