Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35090560›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2022

A pragmatic approach to identifying implementation barriers and facilitators for a novel pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) delivery model at public facilities in urban Uganda.

Dorothy Thomas, Andrew Mujugira, Katrina Ortblad, Sylvia Namanda, Joseph Kibuuka, Mai Nakitende, Florence Nambi, Lylianne Nakabugo, Caitlin Scoville, Timothy Muwonge and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03586128 completednot on this map

Integrated PrEP and ART Delivered in Ugandan Public Health Clinics to Improve HIV and ART Outcomes for HIV Serodiscordant Couples

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2018 to 2021Enrolled1,381ConditionsHIV InfectionsArmsPrEP, ART
NCT06075108 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

P-KIDs CARE: An Intervention to Address Health Systems Delays to Care for Injured Children in Tanzania

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2024 to 2028Enrolled284ConditionsAccidental Injuries, Global Child Health, Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Public Health System ResearchArmsP-KIDs CARE
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Dorothy ThomasDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Ninth and Jefferson Building, HMC 359927, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98104-2499, USA.
Andrew MujugiraDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Ninth and Jefferson Building, HMC 359927, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98104-2499, USA.
Katrina OrtbladPublic Health Science Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Sylvia NamandaInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Joseph KibuukaInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Mai NakitendeInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Florence NambiInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Lylianne NakabugoInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Caitlin ScovilleDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Ninth and Jefferson Building, HMC 359927, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98104-2499, USA.
Timothy MuwongeInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Renee HeffronDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Ninth and Jefferson Building, HMC 359927, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98104-2499, USA. rheffron@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6039-0352
Infectious Diseases Institute · UGUniversity of Washington · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

Integrated PrEP and ART delivered in Ugandan public health clinics to improve HIV and ART outcomes for HIV serodiscordant couplesR01MH110296 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HEFFRON, RENEE A. · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH110296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScalable HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) delivery models for resource-limited settings are critical for improving PrEP coverage and interrupting HIV transmission. This research uses technical assistance (TA) reports to evaluate implementation barriers and facilitators for a novel delivery model integrating PrEP and antiretroviral therapy (ART) delivery for HIV sero-different couples in public health facilities in Kampala, Uganda.

methodsWe used data from the Partners PrEP Program (PPP)-a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial that is launching PrEP delivery through an integrated model of oral PrEP and antiretroviral therapy (ART) delivery for HIV sero-different couples at public health facilities in Kampala and Wakiso, Uganda (NCT03586128). Technical assistance teams, comprised of PPP program staff, conducted monthly TA visits to implementing facilities where they identified and addressed implementation challenges in collaboration with health facility staff. Findings were recorded in TA reports, a standardized form structured using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We used a conceptual content analysis approach to evaluate TA reports completed from January to December 2019 and identify implementation barriers and facilitators.

resultsAmong 39 reports from the 8 implementing facilities (~ 5 per facility), we identified 11 CFIR constructs. Key implementation facilitators included sensitizing and educating facility staff about PrEP (knowledge and beliefs about the innovation); establishing formal and informal feedback and accountability mechanisms (reflecting and evaluating); and empowering facility staff to address implementation challenges (self-efficacy). Key implementation barriers were related to ineffective recruitment and referral of sero-different couples to and from nearby facilities (cosmopolitanism) as well as stockouts of laboratory resources and testing supplies (available resources).

conclusionsThis analysis featured a robust implementation science framework to assess the relationship between early implementation determinants and outcomes of this innovative PrEP delivery model. Further, we have provided important descriptions of early implementation barriers and facilitators that will inform scale-up efforts for PrEP delivery within and beyond Uganda. Future work will refine the analysis of pragmatic program data, qualitatively investigate the identified key themes, and explore strategies for addressing implementation barriers.

Indexed as

BarriersCFIRFacilitatorsHIVImplementationLMICPrEPUganda

Identifiers

PMID35090560
PMCPMC8795935
OpenAlexW4210714274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.