Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35090532›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics & chromatin2022

Making sense of the linear genome, gene function and TADs.

Helen S Long, Simon Greenaway, George Powell, Ann-Marie Mallon, Cecilia M Lindgren, Michelle M Simon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics & chromatin, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Interrogating the regulatory epigenome of cellular senescence.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. HiChIP to Study 3D Genome Organization in Xenopus tropicalis Embryos.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  13. Evidence for Fgf and Wnt regulation ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Vole genomics links determinate and indeterminate growth of teeth.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Helen S LongNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. h.long@har.mrc.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6100-756X
Simon GreenawayMammalian Genetics Unit, Harwell Institute, Didcot, UK.
George PowellNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ann-Marie MallonMammalian Genetics Unit, Harwell Institute, Didcot, UK.
Cecilia M LindgrenWellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Michelle M SimonMammalian Genetics Unit, Harwell Institute, Didcot, UK. mmsimon@compbiology.co.uk.
Mary Lyon Centre at MRC Harwell · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBBroad Institute · US

Funding

Mouse Phenotyping Informatics Infrastructure - MP12UM1HG006370 · NHGRI · EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY · PI Pilar Cacheiro Martinez, Helen Elizabeth Parkinson · 2016 to 2026
$20.4M
Medical Research Council MC_U142684171NHGRI NIH HHS UM1 HG006370Wellcome Trust 203141/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTopologically associating domains (TADs) are thought to act as functional units in the genome. TADs co-localise genes and their regulatory elements as well as forming the unit of genome switching between active and inactive compartments. This has led to the speculation that genes which are required for similar processes may fall within the same TADs, allowing them to share regulatory programs and efficiently switch between chromatin compartments. However, evidence to link genes within TADs to the same regulatory program is limited.

resultsWe investigated the functional similarity of genes which fall within the same TAD. To do this we developed a TAD randomisation algorithm to generate sets of "random TADs" to act as null distributions. We found that while pairs of paralogous genes are enriched in TADs overall, they are largely depleted in TADs with CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) ChIP-seq peaks at both boundaries. By assessing gene constraint as a proxy for functional importance we found that genes which singly occupy a TAD have greater functional importance than genes which share a TAD, and these genes are enriched for developmental processes. We found little evidence that pairs of genes in CTCF bound TADs are more likely to be co-expressed or share functional annotations than can be explained by their linear proximity alone.

conclusionsThese results suggest that algorithmically defined TADs consist of two functionally different groups, those which are bound by CTCF and those which are not. We detected no association between genes sharing the same CTCF TADs and increased co-expression or functional similarity, other than that explained by linear genome proximity. We do, however, find that functionally important genes are more likely to fall within a TAD on their own suggesting that TADs play an important role in the insulation of these genes.

Indexed as

ChromatinGenomeCCCTC-Binding FactorChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyChromatin Immunoprecipitation SequencingCCCTC-Binding FactorChromatinChromatin structureGene expressionGene functionGene regulationHi-CTADsTopologically associating domains

Identifiers

PMID35090532
PMCPMC8800309
OpenAlexW4210336695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.