Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35090517›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2022

Effects of Balance Exercise Assist Robot training for patients with hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

Seigo Inoue, Yohei Otaka, Masashi Kumagai, Masafumi Sugasawa, Naoki Mori, Kunitsugu Kondo

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Impact of Tai Ji Yunshou with Visual Feedback on Balance and Mobility in Stroke Patients.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seigo Inoue *Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Yohei Otaka *Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital, Chiba, Japan. otaka119@mac.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6797-2782
Masashi KumagaiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Masafumi SugasawaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Naoki MoriDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Kunitsugu KondoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Hebei Rehabilitation Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobot-assisted rehabilitation for patients with stroke is promising. However, it is unclear whether additional balance training using a balance-focused robot combined with conventional rehabilitation programs supplements the balance function in patients with stroke. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of Balance Exercise Assist Robot (BEAR) training combined with conventional inpatient rehabilitation training to those of conventional inpatient rehabilitation only in patients with hemiparetic stroke. We also aimed to determine whether BEAR training was superior to intensive balance training.

methodsThis assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial included 60 patients with first-ever hemiparetic stroke, admitted to rehabilitation wards between December 2016 and February 2019. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups, robotic balance training and conventional inpatient rehabilitation (BEAR group), intensive balance training and conventional inpatient rehabilitation (IBT group), or conventional inpatient rehabilitation-only (CR group). The intervention duration was 2 weeks, with assessments conducted pre- and post-intervention, and at 2 weeks follow-up. The primary outcome measure was a change in the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) score from baseline.

resultsIn total, 57 patients completed the intervention, and 48 patients were evaluated at the follow-up. Significant improvements in Mini-BESTest score were observed in the BEAR and IBT groups compared with in the CR group post-intervention and after the 2-week follow-up period (P < 0.05).

conclusionsThe addition of balance exercises using the BEAR alongside conventional inpatient rehabilitation improved balance in patients with subacute stroke.

trial registrationhttps://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr ; Unique Identifier: UMIN000025129. Registered on 2 December 2016.

Indexed as

RoboticsStrokeStroke RehabilitationExercise TherapyHumansPhysical Therapy ModalitiesCerebrovascular disorderExercisePhysical therapyPostural balanceRehabilitationRobotics

Identifiers

PMID35090517
PMCPMC8796441
OpenAlexW4210250396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.