Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35090505›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2022

Benefits of a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic foot for ascending and descending slopes.

Michael Ernst, Björn Altenburg, Thomas Schmalz, Andreas Kannenberg, Malte Bellmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Motion Analysis of a Frontal Plane Adaptable Prosthetic Foot.Journal of prosthetics and orthotics : JPO · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The nonsalvageable tibia: amputation and prosthetics.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Influence of Transtibial Prosthesis Type on Lower-Body Gait Adaptation: A Case Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael ErnstResearch Biomechanics, CR&S, Ottobock SE & Co. KGaA, Göttingen, Germany. michael.ernst@ottobock.de.ORCID 0000-0001-5805-3357
Björn AltenburgResearch Biomechanics, CR&S, Ottobock SE & Co. KGaA, Göttingen, Germany.
Thomas SchmalzResearch Biomechanics, CR&S, Ottobock SE & Co. KGaA, Göttingen, Germany.
Andreas KannenbergMedical Affairs, Otto Bock Healthcare LP, Austin, USA.
Malte BellmannResearch Biomechanics, CR&S, Ottobock SE & Co. KGaA, Göttingen, Germany.
Ottobock (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProsthetic feet are prescribed for persons with a lower-limb amputation to restore lost mobility. However, due to limited adaptability of their ankles and springs, situations like walking on slopes or uneven ground remain challenging. This study investigated to what extent a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic foot (MPF) facilitates walking on slopes.

methodsSeven persons each with a unilateral transtibial amputation (TTA) and unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFA) as well as ten able-bodied subjects participated. Participants were studied while using a MPF and their prescribed standard feet with fixed ankle attachments. The study investigated ascending and descending a 10° slope. Kinematic and kinetic data were recorded with a motion capture system. Biomechanical parameters, in particular leg joint angles, shank orientation and external joint moments of the prosthetics side were calculated.

resultsProsthetic feet- and subject group-dependent joint angle and moment characteristics were observed for both situations. The MPF showed a larger and situation-dependent ankle range of motion compared to the standard feet. Furthermore, it remained in a dorsiflexed position during swing. While ascending, the MPF adapted the dorsiflexion moment and reduced the knee extension moment. At vertical shank orientation, it reduced the knee extension moment by 26% for TFA and 49% for TTA compared to the standard feet. For descending, differences between feet in the biomechanical knee characteristics were found for the TTA group, but not for the TFA group. At the vertical shank angle during slope descent, TTA demonstrated a behavior of the ankle moment similar to able-bodied controls when using the MPF.

conclusionsThe studied MPF facilitated walking on slopes by adapting instantaneously to inclinations and, thus, easing the forward rotation of the leg over the prosthetic foot compared to standard feet with a fixed ankle attachment with amputation-level dependent effect sizes. It assumed a dorsiflexed ankle angle during swing, enabled a larger ankle range of motion and reduced the moments acting on the residual knee of TTA compared to the prescribed prosthetic standard feet. For individuals with TFA, the prosthetic knee joint seems to play a more crucial role for walking on ramps than the foot.

Indexed as

AmputeesArtificial LimbsAmputation, SurgicalBiomechanical PhenomenaFootGaitHumansMicrocomputersProsthesis DesignWalkingBiomechanicsMicroprocessor-controlled prosthetic feetProsthetic kneeProstheticsRamp walking

Identifiers

PMID35090505
PMCPMC8796559
OpenAlexW4210792780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.