Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35090455›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Lean adoption, implementation, and outcomes in public hospitals: benchmarking the US and Italy health systems.

Marta Marsilio, Martina Pisarra, Karl Rubio, Stephen Shortell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Lean Adoption in Healthcare: Between Promise and Practice.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. The maturity of lean management in a large academic medical center in Finland: a qualitative study.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marta MarsilioDepartment of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods (DEMM), Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Conservatorio, 7, 20122, Milan, Italy. marta.marsilio@unimi.it.
Martina PisarraDepartment of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods (DEMM), Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Conservatorio, 7, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Karl RubioCenter for Healthcare Organizational and Innovation Research, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
Stephen ShortellCenter for Lean Engagement and Research in Healthcare, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the growing interest in transformational performance improvement among nearly all countries, international benchmarking has rarely been used. Cross-comparative research could allow an appreciation of the extent of Lean's use in healthcare and a better evaluation of possible cultural influences on Lean implementation. This study provides a comparative international benchmarking of Lean adoption, implementation, and outcomes of hospitals in the US and Italy.

methodsThe National Survey of Lean, developed in 2017 in the US and adapted in Italy in 2019 was used to compare the two healthcare systems along three dimensions: the maturity of adoption, the implementation approach, identifying both strategic and operational activities and tools, and the Lean performance, investigated through patients, employed, and affiliated staff, costs, and service provision areas. Descriptive statistics including T-tests were used to examine differences between the two countries on the study variables.

resultsLean has been adopted less by Italian public hospitals (36%) than US public hospitals (53%). Each country averages 4 years of experience with Lean. Italian hospitals reported being at a higher maturity stage while the US implemented a more system-wide approach, developing Lean in more operational units. The daily management system, leadership commitment, education and training indexes were higher or the same in the US while in Italy, hospitals had a higher self-reported performance index.

conclusionThis exploratory work is one of the first international benchmarking studies on Lean implementation in healthcare systems using a standardized survey with a common set of definitions and questions. The study identifies different forms of Lean implementation that can be adopted, both at strategic and operational levels, with related perceived outcomes. Despite the US public hospitals being more likely to report a higher number of units using Lean, a higher daily management system index and use of Lean tools, Italian hospitals report more achievements primarily due to Lean. Further research can build on these findings by examining the relationship between Lean adoption/implementation and independent, objective performance measures.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingTotal Quality ManagementGovernment ProgramsHospitals, PublicHumansQuality ImprovementBenchmarkingItalian national healthcare systemLean healthcareOutcomesPerformance improvementPublic hospitalsUnited States healthcare system

Identifiers

PMID35090455
PMCPMC8800363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.