Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35090069›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2022

Effect of sampling site on the diagnosis of canine parvovirus infection in dogs using polymerase chain reaction.

Gilad Segev, Tal Yaaran, Sarah Maurice, Gad Baneth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Red Foxes (Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gilad SegevKoret School of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Research and Development, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4714-3159
Tal YaaranDepartment of Research and Development, Biogal Galed Labs, Kibbutz Galed, Israel.
Sarah MauriceDepartment of Research and Development, Biogal Galed Labs, Kibbutz Galed, Israel.
Gad BanethKoret School of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Research and Development, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7549-1305
GALAB Laboratories (Germany) · DEHebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate diagnosis is imperative in dogs with clinical signs of parvovirus infection (CPV-2).

objectivesTo assess quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) for the diagnosis of CPV-2 infection, and determine the optimal sampling site. Secondarily, to compare qRT-PCR with a point-of-care PCR kit (PCRun), and to assess sensitivity of serology for CPV diagnosis. ANIMALS: Sixty dogs with naturally acquired parvovirus infection, 44 unvaccinated puppies, of which 16 were followed after first and second vaccination, 15 adult dogs, of which 10 were followed also after a booster vaccine, and 9 dogs with distemper virus infection.

methodsProspective study. Samples from the rectum, blood, and pharynx were obtained for PCR.

resultsAll dogs with a clinical diagnosis of parvovirus infection were positive by qRT-PCR in at least 1 sampling site (ie, rectum, blood, pharynx), and 50 (83%) of 60 were positive in all sites. qRT-PCR was negative in 67 (99%) of 68 healthy puppies (before-vaccination), puppies with distemper, and healthy adult dogs. Ten days after initial vaccination of puppies, 62% (fecal), 31% (blood), and 12% (pharyngeal) of samples were positive for CPV-2 on qRT-PCR. The proportion of positive pharyngeal samples decreased 20 days after vaccination and all sites were negative 12-28 days after second vaccination. Vaccinated adults were negative before and after booster vaccination. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Molecular detection of CPV is sensitive, but specificity is hampered temporarily during the vaccination period. Blood, feces, and pharynx are suitable sampling sites. Fecal samples had the lowest sensitivity in sick dogs and highest positivity in puppies after vaccination.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesParvoviridae InfectionsParvovirus, CanineAnimalsDogsProspective StudiesReal-Time Polymerase Chain Reactiondiagnosispolymerase chain reactionpuppyserologyviralvomiting

Identifiers

PMID35090069
PMCPMC8965247
OpenAlexW4210688747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.