Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35090014›Full record

SynthesisThe Gerontologist2022

Measuring the Quality of Care for Older Adults With Multimorbidity: Results of the MULTIqual Project.

Josefine Schulze, Katharina Glassen, Nadine J Pohontsch, Eva Blozik, Tabea Eißing, Amanda Breckner, Charlotte Höflich, Anja Rakebrandt, Ingmar Schäfer, Joachim Szecsenyi and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Gerontologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Developing quality measures for non-pharmacological prevention and rehabilitation in primary health care for chronic conditions: a consensus study.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Josefine SchulzeDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5727-9343
Katharina GlassenDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8892-8625
Nadine J PohontschDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0966-4087
Eva BlozikInstitute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0620-6873
Tabea EißingDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2251-1018
Amanda BrecknerDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0777-5223
Charlotte HöflichDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Anja RakebrandtDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1599-0188
Ingmar SchäferDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1038-7478
Joachim SzecsenyiDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4483-0028
Martin SchererDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Dagmar LühmannDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7965-5007

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesProviding health care for older adults with multimorbidity is often complex, challenging, and prone to fragmentation. Although clinical decision making should take into account treatment interactions, individual burden, and resources, current approaches to assessing quality of care mostly rely on indicators for single conditions. The aim of this project was to develop a set of generic quality indicators for the management of patients aged 65 and older with multimorbidity that can be used in both health care research and clinical practice. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsBased on the findings of a systematic literature review and eight focus groups with patients with multimorbidity and their family members, we developed candidate indicators. Identified aspects of quality were mapped to core domains of health care to obtain a guiding framework for quality-of-care assessment. Using nominal group technique, indicators were rated by a multidisciplinary expert panel (n = 23) following standardized criteria.

resultsWe derived 47 candidate quality indicators from the literature and 4 additional indicators from the results of the focus groups. The expert panel selected a set of 25 indicators, which can be assigned to the levels of patient factors, patient-provider communication, and context and organizational structures of the conceptual framework. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: We developed a comprehensive indicator set for the management of multimorbidity that can help to highlight areas with potential for improving the quality of care and support application of multimorbidity guidelines. Furthermore, this study may serve as a blueprint for participatory designs in the development of quality indicators.

Indexed as

CommunicationMultimorbidityAgedHumansChronic careComorbidityPatient-centered carePrimary careQuality standard

Identifiers

PMID35090014
PMCPMC9451020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.