ArticlePloS one2022
Evaluation of critical data processing steps for reliable prediction of gene co-expression from large collections of RNA-seq data.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Constructing gene co-functional and co-regulatory networks from public transcriptomes using condition-specific ensemble co-expression.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Sex-dependent relationships between PFAS and placental transcriptomics identified by weighted gene co-expression analysis.Environmental research · 2025Article
- Bioinformatics perspectives on transcriptomics: A comprehensive review of bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing analyses.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2025Review
- Gene2role: a role-based gene embedding method for comparative analysis of signed gene regulatory networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Single-cell network biology enabling cell-type-resolved disease genetics.Genomics & informatics · 2025Review
- Article
- CoGTEx: Unscaled system-level coexpression estimation from GTEx data forecast novel functional gene partners.PloS one · 2024Article
- Identification of ligand and receptor interactions in CKD and MASH through the integration of single cell and spatial transcriptomics.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- A universal tool for predicting differentially active features in single-cell and spatial genomics data.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- COXPRESdb v8: an animal gene coexpression database navigating from a global view to detailed investigations.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Approaches in Gene Coexpression Analysis in Eukaryotes.Biology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationGene co-expression analysis is an attractive tool for leveraging enormous amounts of public RNA-seq datasets for the prediction of gene functions and regulatory mechanisms. However, the optimal data processing steps for the accurate prediction of gene co-expression from such large datasets remain unclear. Especially the importance of batch effect correction is understudied.
resultsWe processed RNA-seq data of 68 human and 76 mouse cell types and tissues using 50 different workflows into 7,200 genome-wide gene co-expression networks. We then conducted a systematic analysis of the factors that result in high-quality co-expression predictions, focusing on normalization, batch effect correction, and measure of correlation. We confirmed the key importance of high sample counts for high-quality predictions. However, choosing a suitable normalization approach and applying batch effect correction can further improve the quality of co-expression estimates, equivalent to a >80% and >40% increase in samples. In larger datasets, batch effect removal was equivalent to a more than doubling of the sample size. Finally, Pearson correlation appears more suitable than Spearman correlation, except for smaller datasets.
conclusionA key point for accurate prediction of gene co-expression is the collection of many samples. However, paying attention to data normalization, batch effects, and the measure of correlation can significantly improve the quality of co-expression estimates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.