Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35089942›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Population wide testing pooling strategy for SARS-CoV-2 detection using saliva.

Eduardo Esteves, Ana Karina Mendes, Marlene Barros, Cátia Figueiredo, Joana Andrade, Joana Capelo, António Novais, Carla Rebelo, Rita Soares, Ana Nunes and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Validation of RT-qPCR test for SARS-CoV-2 in saliva specimens.Journal of infection and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Eduardo EstevesUniversidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculty of Dental Medicine (FMD), Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Viseu, Portugal.
Ana Karina MendesUniversidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculty of Dental Medicine (FMD), Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Viseu, Portugal.
Marlene BarrosUniversidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculty of Dental Medicine (FMD), Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Viseu, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0631-4062
Cátia FigueiredoCentro Hospitalar Tondela Viseu, Viseu, Portugal.
Joana AndradeCentro Hospitalar Tondela Viseu, Viseu, Portugal.
Joana CapeloCentro Hospitalar Tondela Viseu, Viseu, Portugal.
António NovaisCentro Hospitalar Tondela Viseu, Viseu, Portugal.
Carla RebeloCentro Hospitalar Tondela Viseu, Viseu, Portugal.
Rita SoaresCentro Hospitalar Tondela Viseu, Viseu, Portugal.
Ana NunesCentro Hospitalar Tondela Viseu, Viseu, Portugal.
André FerreiraCentro Hospitalar Tondela Viseu, Viseu, Portugal.
Joana LemosCentro Hospitalar Tondela Viseu, Viseu, Portugal.
Ana Sofia DuarteUniversidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculty of Dental Medicine (FMD), Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Viseu, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6849-6004
Raquel M SilvaUniversidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculty of Dental Medicine (FMD), Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Viseu, Portugal.
Liliana Inácio BernardinoFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.
Maria José CorreiaUniversidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculty of Dental Medicine (FMD), Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Viseu, Portugal.
Ana Cristina EstevesDepartment of Biology, CESAM, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2239-2976
Nuno RosaUniversidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculty of Dental Medicine (FMD), Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Viseu, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4604-0780
Centro Hospitalar Tondela-Viseu · PTUniversidade Católica Portuguesa · PTUniversity of Beira Interior · PTUniversity of Aveiro · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has forced frequent testing of populations. It is necessary to identify the most cost-effective strategies for the detection of COVID-19 outbreaks. Nasopharyngeal samples have been used for SARS-CoV-2 detection but require a healthcare professional to collect the sample and cause discomfort and pain to the individual. Saliva has been suggested as an appropriate fluid for the diagnosis of COVID-19. We have investigated the possibility of using pools of saliva samples to detect SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Two hundred and seventy-nine saliva samples were analyzed through RT-PCR of Envelope, Nucleocapsid and Open Reading Frame 1ab genes. Reproducibility assays showed an almost perfect agreement as well as high sensitivity (96.6%), specificity (96.8%), positive predicted value (96.6%), and negative predicted value (96.8%). The average Cycle Threshold of the genes detected was 29.7. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were detected when comparing the cycle threshold average of two consecutive reactions on the same positive saliva samples. Saliva samples have a higher median viral load (32.6) than in nasopharyngeal samples (28.9), although no significant differences were detected (p > 0.05). Saliva-pool samples allowed effective SARS-CoV-2 screening, with a higher sensibility (96.9%) on 10-sample pools than in 20-sample pools (87.5%). Regardless of pools size specificity was high (99.9%) and an almost perfect agreement was observed. Our strategy was successfully applied in population wide testing of more than 2000 individuals, showing that it is possible to use pooled saliva as diagnostic fluid for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 TestingHumansReproducibility of ResultsSalivaSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen Handling

Identifiers

PMID35089942
PMCPMC8797214
OpenAlexW4210598133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.