Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35089940›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2022

Phylogenetic analysis and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of uropathogens.

Hanif Ullah, Kashif Bashir, Muhammad Idrees, Amin Ullah, Neelma Hassan, Sara Khan, Bilal Nasir, Tariq Nadeem, Hina Ahsan, Muhammad Islam Khan and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Global prevalence of macrolide-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Mutation analysis of dihydrofolate reductase (Iranian journal of microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Hanif UllahDepartment of Health & Biological Sciences, Faculty of life Sciences, Abasyn University, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Kashif BashirDepartment of Health & Biological Sciences, Faculty of life Sciences, Abasyn University, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Muhammad IdreesDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Swabi, Swabi, Pakistan.
Amin UllahDepartment of Health & Biological Sciences, Faculty of life Sciences, Abasyn University, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Neelma HassanDepartment of Health & Biological Sciences, Faculty of life Sciences, Abasyn University, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Sara KhanDepartment of Health & Biological Sciences, Faculty of life Sciences, Abasyn University, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Bilal NasirDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Swabi, Swabi, Pakistan.
Tariq NadeemCenter of Excellence in Molecular Biology, University of The Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Hina AhsanFaculty of Pharmacy, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Islam KhanCenter of Excellence in Molecular Biology, University of The Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Qurban AliInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-3160-4830
Sher MuhammadDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biotechnology, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad AfzalDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biotechnology, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Abasyn University · PKGovernment College University, Faisalabad · PKUniversity of Swabi · PKRiphah International University · PKUniversity of Lahore · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The uropathogens is the main cause of urinary tract infection (UTI). The aim of the study was to isolate bacteria from urine samples of UTI patients and find out the susceptibility of isolated bacteria. Bacteria were identified using both conventional and molecular methods. Sanger sequence procedure used for 16S ribosomal RNA and phylogenetic analysis was performed using Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA-7) software. In this study, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, Staphylococcus were reported as 58, 28 and 14.0% respectively. Phylogenetic tree revealed that 99% of sample No. Ai (05) is closely related to E. coli to (NR 114042.1 E. coli strain NBRC 102203). Aii (23) is 99% similar to K. pneumoniae to (NR 117686.1 K. pneumonia strain DSM 30104) and 90% Bi (48) is closely linked to S. aureus to (NR 113956.1 S. aureus strain NBRC 100910). The antibiotic susceptibility of E. coli recorded highest resistance towards ampicillin (90%) and least resistant to ofloxacin (14%). Some of the other antibiotics such amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, ceftazidime, cefuroxime and nitrofurantoin resistance were observed 86, 62, 24, 55, 48 and 35% respectively. The cefuroxime showed the highest antibiotic resistance against K. pneumoniae with 85% followed by amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, ceftazidime, ampicillin and nitrofurantoin resulted in 60, 45, 67, 70, 75 and 30% respectively. The resistance of S. aureus against erythromycin, cefuroxime and ampicillin were found with 72%. The resistance against amoxicillin, gentamicin, ceftazidime and ceftriaxone found 57, 43, 43 and 15% respectively. Phylogenetic analysis shows that sequences are closely related with the reference sequences and E. coli is the dominant bacteria among UTI patients and is resistant to the commercially available antibiotics.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial InfectionsPhylogenyUrinary Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID35089940
PMCPMC8797202
OpenAlexW4210753353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.