Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35089651›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2022

The COlorectal NEoplasia Endoscopic Classification to Choose the Treatment classification for identification of large laterally spreading lesions lacking submucosal carcinomas: A prospective study of 663 lesions.

Clementine Brule, Mathieu Pioche, Jeremie Albouys, Jerome Rivory, Sophie Geyl, Romain Legros, Florian Rostain, Martin Dahan, Hugo Lepetit, Denis Sautereau and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Endoscopic approach to large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. UEG week and UEG journal: A strong scientific liaison.United European gastroenterology journal · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Clementine BruleDepartment of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1711-1845
Mathieu PiocheDepartment of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Jeremie AlbouysDepartment of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Jerome RivoryDepartment of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Sophie GeylDepartment of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Romain LegrosDepartment of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Florian RostainDepartment of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Martin DahanDepartment of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Hugo LepetitDepartment of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Denis SautereauDepartment of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Thierry PonchonDepartment of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Emilie AuditeauDepartment of Epidemiology, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Jeremie JacquesDepartment of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Hôpital Dupuytren · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRHôpital Universitaire Dupuytren · FRXLIM · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOptical diagnosis is necessary when selecting the resection modality for large superficial colorectal lesions. The COlorectal NEoplasia Endoscopic Classification to Choose the Treatment (CONECCT) encompasses overt (irregular pit or vascular pattern) and covert (macroscopic features) signs of carcinoma in an all-in-one classification using validated criteria. The CONECCT IIC subtype corresponds to adenomas with a high risk of superficial carcinoma that should be resected en bloc with free margins.

methodsThis prospective multicentre study investigated the diagnostic accuracy of the CONECCT classification for predicting submucosal invasion in colorectal lesions >20 mm. Optical diagnosis before en bloc resection by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was compared with the final histological diagnosis. Diagnostic accuracy for the CONECCT IIC subtype was compared with literature-validated features of concern considered to be risk factors for submucosal invasion (non-granular large spreading tumour [NG LST], macronodule >1 cm, SANO IIIA area, and Paris 0-IIC area).

resultsSix hundred 63 lesions removed by ESD were assessed. The en bloc, R0, and curative resection rates were respectively 96%, 85%, and 81%. The CONECCT classification had a sensitivity (Se) of 100%, specificity (Sp) of 26.2%, positive predictive value of 11.6%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% for predicting at least submucosal adenocarcinoma. The sensitivity of CONECCT IIC (100%) to predict submucosal cancer was superior to all other criteria evaluated. COlorectal NEoplasia Endoscopic Classification to Choose the Treatment IIC lesions constituted 11.5% of all submucosal carcinomas.

conclusionThe CONECCT classification, which combines covert and overt signs of carcinoma, identifies with very perfect sensitivity (Se 100%, NPV 100%) the 30% of low-risk adenomas in large laterally spreading lesions treatable by piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection or ESD according to expertise without undertreatment. However, the low specificity of CONECCT leads to a large number of potentially not indicated ESDs for suspected high-risk lesions.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionAdenomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinomaColorectal NeoplasmsDermatitis, Allergic ContactFemaleHumansIntestinal MucosaMaleMethacrylatesMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessPredictive Value of TestsMethacrylatescolonoscopyEMRendoscopyESDoptical diagnosissubmucosal carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID35089651
PMCPMC8830277
OpenAlexW4210768474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.