ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022
Methods for the Characterization of Protein Aggregates.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The physicochemical characterization of protein aggregates yields an important contribution to further our understanding on many diseases for which the formation of protein aggregates is one of the pathological hallmarks. On the other hand, bacterial inclusion bodies (IBs) have recently been shown to be highly pure proteinaceous aggregates of a few hundred nanometers, produced by recombinant bacteria supporting the biological activities of the embedded polypeptides. Despite the wide spectrum of uses of IBs as functional and biocompatible materials upon convenient engineering, very few is known about their physicochemical properties.In this chapter we present methods for the characterization of protein aggregates as particulate materials relevant to their physicochemical and nanoscale properties.Specifically, we describe the use of dynamic light scattering (DLS) for sizing, nanoparticle tracking analysis for sizing and counting, and zeta potential measurements for the determination of colloidal stability. To study the morphology of protein aggregates we present the use of atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Cryo-transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) will be used for the determination of the internal structuration. Moreover, wettability and nanomechanical characterization can be performed using contact angle (CA) and force spectroscopic AFM (FS-AFM) measurements of the proteinaceous nanoparticles, respectively. Finally, the 4'4-dithiodipyridine (DTDP) method is presented as a way of relatively quantifying accessible sulfhydryl groups in the structure of the nanoparticle .The physical principles of the methods are briefly described and examples are given to help clarify capabilities of each technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.