Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35089533›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology2022

Consensus Development of a Core Content for a Standardized Medical Toxicology Curriculum for Medical Students.

Charlotte Goldfine, Derrick Lung, Gillian Beauchamp, Ayrn O'Connor, Andrew Stolbach, Louise Kao, Bryan Judge, Paul Wax, Rahul Patwari, Ziad Kazzi

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Charlotte GoldfineDivision of Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. cgoldfine@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2914-166X
Derrick LungDivision of Clinical Pharmacology and Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Mateo Medical Center, San Mateo, CA, USA.
Gillian BeauchampDepartment of Emergency and Hospital Medicine, Division of Medical Toxicology, Lehigh Valley Health Network, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Allentown, PA, USA.
Ayrn O'ConnorBanner - University Medical Center Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Andrew StolbachDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Louise KaoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Division of Medical Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Bryan JudgeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Paul WaxSouthwestern School of Medicine, University of Texas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Rahul PatwariRush Medical College, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ziad KazziGeorgia Poison Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently, no standardized core content in medical toxicology exists for medical students. The goals of this study were to (1) assess the current state and needs of medical toxicology clerkships and (2) develop a consensus-derived list of core topics that should be covered during a medical toxicology clerkship.

methodsWe assembled a task force established by the American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT) of nine experts in medical toxicology or emergency medicine. We developed a needs assessment survey that was sent to all medical student clerkship directors in medical toxicology. Based on their responses, we used a modified Delphi process to develop a consensus of core topics that should be covered during a medical student clerkship.

resultsNineteen out of 42 (45%) clerkship directors completed the survey; 18 met inclusion criteria. The majority of clerkships were 4 weeks in duration with an average of 15 students/year. The three most common teaching methods used were bedside teaching (n = 17/18), classroom teaching (n = 17/18), and journal club (n = 14/18). All the clerkship directors (n = 18/18) reported they would use a standardized curriculum as well as educational content developed by ACMT. There was overwhelming consensus on the core topics which included, but were not limited to, pharmacology/toxicology; drugs; drugs of abuse; natural products; pharmacological basis of antidote use; toxicologic syndromes; vital sign abnormalities; initial management; supportive and other care; withdrawal syndrome management; industrial, household, and environmental toxins; differential diagnosis by clinical findings; and ABCs-resuscitation.

conclusionThe ACMT task force developed a medical toxicology clerkship core content. The task force also identified a need for shared resources among clerkships.

Indexed as

Clinical ClerkshipEmergency MedicineStudents, MedicalCurriculumHumansUnited StatesCore contentMedical educationMedical toxicology

Identifiers

PMID35089533
PMCPMC8796743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.