Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Rahisa ScusselPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Energia e Sustentabilidade, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, R. Pedro João Pereira, Mato Alto, Araranguá, SC, 88905-120, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0931-604X
Ana Carolina FeltrinLaboratório de Desenvolvimento de Biomateriais e Materiais Antimicrobianos, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência e Engenharia de Materiais, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Iparque - Parque Científico e Tecnológico, Rod. Gov. Jorge Lacerda, Sangão, 3800 CEP, Criciúma, SC, 88806-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9920-1643
Elidio AngiolettoLaboratório de Desenvolvimento de Biomateriais e Materiais Antimicrobianos, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência e Engenharia de Materiais, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Iparque - Parque Científico e Tecnológico, Rod. Gov. Jorge Lacerda, Sangão, 3800 CEP, Criciúma, SC, 88806-000, Brazil. ean@unesc.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4417-3440
Nathalia Coral GalvaniLaboratório de Fisiopatologia Experimental, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Avenida Universitária, Universitário, Criciúma, SC, 88806-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2023-0754
Mírian Ívens FagundesLaboratório de Fisiopatologia Experimental, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Avenida Universitária, Universitário, Criciúma, SC, 88806-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7451-2285
Adriano Michael BernardinLaboratório de Desenvolvimento de Biomateriais e Materiais Antimicrobianos, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência e Engenharia de Materiais, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Iparque - Parque Científico e Tecnológico, Rod. Gov. Jorge Lacerda, Sangão, 3800 CEP, Criciúma, SC, 88806-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4132-5007
Paulo Emilio FeuserLaboratório de Fisiopatologia Experimental, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Avenida Universitária, Universitário, Criciúma, SC, 88806-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2372-8945
Ricardo Andrez Machado de ÁvilaLaboratório de Fisiopatologia Experimental, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Avenida Universitária, Universitário, Criciúma, SC, 88806-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1303-0490
Claus Tröger PichPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Energia e Sustentabilidade, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, R. Pedro João Pereira, Mato Alto, Araranguá, SC, 88905-120, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6415-6800
Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense · BRUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BR
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Preservative treatments increase the durability of wood, and one of the alternative treatments involves the use of chromated copper arsenate (CCA). Due to the toxicity of CCA, the disposal of CCA-treated wood residues is problematic, and burning is considered to provide a solution. The ecotoxicological potential of ash can be high when these components are toxic and mutagenic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and genotoxicity of bottom ash leachates originating from CCA-treated wood burning. Physical-chemical analysis of the leachates revealed that in treated wood ashes leachate (CCA-TWBAL), the contents of arsenic and chromium were 59.45 mg.L
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Ecotoxic, genotoxic, and cytotoxic potential of leachate obtained from chromated copper arsenate-treated wood ashes. · full record | OpenQuestion