Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35089457›Full record

Article3D printing in medicine2022

Patient-specific 3D-printed helmet for post-craniectomy defect - a case report.

Sherby Suet-Ying Pang, Evan Fang, Kam Wai Chen, Matthew Leung, Velda Ling-Yu Chow, Christian Fang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3D printing in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sherby Suet-Ying PangDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Evan FangDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. evanjfang@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0034-0753
Kam Wai ChenProsthetics and Orthotics Department, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Matthew LeungDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Velda Ling-Yu ChowDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Christian FangDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
University of Hong Kong · HKChinese University of Hong Kong · HKQueen Mary Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients who undergo decompressive craniectomy (DC) are often fitted with a helmet that protects the craniectomy site from injury during rehabilitation. However, conventional "one-size-fits-all" helmets may not be feasible for certain craniectomy defects. We describe the production and use of a custom 3D-printed helmet for a DC patient where a conventional helmet was not feasible due to the craniectomy defect configuration. CASE PRESENTATION: A 65-year-old male with ethmoid sinonasal carcinoma underwent cranionasal resection and DC with free vastus lateralis flap reconstruction to treat cerebrospinal fluid leakage. He required an external helmet to protect the craniectomy site, however, the rim of a conventional helmet compressed the craniectomy site, and the straps compressed the vascular pedicle of the muscle flap. Computed topography (CT) scans of the patient's cranium were imported into 3D modelling software and used to fabricate a patient-specific, strapless helmet using fused deposition modelling (FDM). The final helmet fit the patient perfectly and circumvented the compression issues, while also providing better cosmesis than the conventional helmet. Four months postoperatively, the helmet remains intact and in use.

conclusions3D printing can be used to produce low-volume, patient-specific external devices for rehabilitation where standardized adjuncts are not optimal. Once initial start-up costs and training are overcome, these devices can be produced by surgeons themselves to meet a wide range of clinical needs.

Indexed as

3D printingDecompressive craniectomyProtective helmetSkull defect

Identifiers

PMID35089457
PMCPMC8796519
OpenAlexW4225710807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.