Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35089452›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2022

Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy (NAST) in Patients with Melanoma: Surgical Considerations by the International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium (INMC).

Alexander C J van Akkooi, Tina J Hieken, Elizabeth M Burton, Charlotte Ariyan, Paolo A Ascierto, Salvatore V M A Asero, Christian U Blank, Matthew S Block, Genevieve M Boland, Corrado Caraco and 32 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neoadjuvant treatment for stage III and IV cutaneous melanoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

42 authors at 20 institutions in 8 countries.

Alexander C J van Akkooi *Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.v.akkooi@nki.nl.
Tina J Hieken *Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Elizabeth M Burton *The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Charlotte AriyanMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Paolo A AsciertoIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
Salvatore V M A AseroAzienda di Rilievo Nazionale e di Alta Specializzazione Garibaldi, Catania, Italy.
Christian U BlankNetherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Matthew S BlockMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Genevieve M BolandMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7522-6173
Corrado CaracoIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
Sydney ChngMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
B Scott DavidsonNorthside Hospital Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Joao Pedreira Duprat NetoAC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mark B FariesThe Angeles Clinic, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jeffrey E GershenwaldThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Dirk J GrunhagenErasmus MC - Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
David E GyorkiPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Dale HanOregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Andrew J HayesRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Winan J van HoudtNetherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Giorgos C KarakousisHospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Willem M C KlopNetherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Georgina V LongMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Michael C LoweWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Alexander M MenziesMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Roger Olofsson BaggeSahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Thomas E PenningtonMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Piotr RutkowskiDepartment of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Robyn P M SawMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Richard A ScolyerMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Kerwin F ShannonMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Vernon K SondakMoffit Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Hussein TawbiThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Alessandro A E TestoriSkin Oncology Division, Image Regenerative Clinic, Milan, Italy.
Mike T TetzlaffUniversity of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA.
John F ThompsonMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jonathan S ZagerMoffit Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Charlotte L ZuurNetherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jennifer A WargoThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Andrew J Spillane *Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Merrick I Ross *The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium (INMC)
The University of Sydney · AUThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USNetherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital · NLIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USAC Camargo Hospital · BRAzienda di Rilievo Nazionale ed Alta Specializzazione · ITCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USEmory University · USErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USLeiden University Medical Center · NLMassachusetts General Hospital · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNorthside Hospital · USOregon Health & Science University · USPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AURoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBSahlgrenska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exciting advances in melanoma systemic therapies have presented the opportunity for surgical oncologists and their multidisciplinary colleagues to test the neoadjuvant systemic treatment approach in high-risk, resectable metastatic melanomas. Here we describe the state of the science of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) for melanoma, focusing on the surgical aspects and the key role of the surgical oncologist in this treatment paradigm. This paper summarizes the past decade of developments in melanoma treatment and the current evidence for NAST in stage III melanoma specifically. Issues of surgical relevance are discussed, including the risk of progression on NAST prior to surgery. Technical aspects, such as the definition of resectability for melanoma and the extent and scope of routine surgery are presented. Other important issues, such as the utility of radiographic response evaluation and method of pathologic response evaluation, are addressed. Surgical complications and perioperative management of NAST related adverse events are considered. The International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium has the goal of harmonizing NAST trials in melanoma to facilitate rapid advances with new approaches, and facilitating the comparison of results across trials evaluating different treatment regimens. Our ultimate goals are to provide definitive proof of the safety and efficacy of NAST in melanoma, sufficient for NAST to become an acceptable standard of care, and to leverage this platform to allow more personalized, biomarker-driven, tailored approaches to subsequent treatment and surveillance.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsCutaneous Malignant MelanomaHumansNeoadjuvant Therapy

Identifiers

PMID35089452
OpenAlexW4210713251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.