Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35089432›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2022

Influence of noise manipulation on retention in a simulated ICU ward round: an experimental pilot study.

Katja Erne, Samuel E J Knobel, Aileen C Naef, Stephan M Gerber, Tim Fischer, Fred W Mast, Joerg C Schefold, Bjoern Zante, Tobias Nef, Marie-Madlen Jeitziner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Low-cost contact microphones for bedside voice assessment: proof of concept.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katja Erne *Gerontechnology and Rehabilitation Group, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 50, 3008, Bern, Switzerland.
Samuel E J Knobel *Gerontechnology and Rehabilitation Group, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 50, 3008, Bern, Switzerland.
Aileen C NaefGerontechnology and Rehabilitation Group, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 50, 3008, Bern, Switzerland.
Stephan M GerberGerontechnology and Rehabilitation Group, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 50, 3008, Bern, Switzerland.
Tim FischerARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Fred W MastDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, Perception and Research Methods, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Joerg C SchefoldDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Bjoern ZanteDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Tobias Nef *Gerontechnology and Rehabilitation Group, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 50, 3008, Bern, Switzerland. tobias.nef@artorg.unibe.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8069-9450
Marie-Madlen Jeitziner *Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNoise exposure leads to a reduction in cognitive abilities in diverse settings, however, only limited data exist examining the effects of environmental ICU noise on the cognitive performance of ICU professionals. A frequently occurring and demanding retention task in ICUs are ward rounds, which are considered key for the provision of medical care. Here, we investigate the influence of noise on information retention in a simulated ward round.

methodsICU professionals were exposed to a recorded, ICU ward round, simulated partly with and partly without environmental ICU noise. Ward rounds were followed by specific questions about previously provided information.

results56 ICU professionals (aged 26-59 years) were included. A logistic mixed model showed a reduction of 27% (P < 0.001) in the ward round test performance when participants were exposed to environmental ICU noise. Furthermore, advanced age was associated with reduced retention (- 28%, P < 0.001), questions containing important information performed better (+ 36%, P < 0.001), and higher stress led to better performance in retention (+ 24%, P = 0.01).

conclusionsOur data showed a considerable negative influence of environmental ICU noise during a simulated ward round. Therefore, reduction of environmental ICU noise is recommended. The influence of additional factors, including stress, priorities, and demographic factors should be pursued in subsequent investigations.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitNoisePilot studyRetentionWard round

Identifiers

PMID35089432
PMCPMC8799802
OpenAlexW4210514461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.