Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35089401›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2022

Identifying bioaugmentation candidates for bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in contaminated estuarine sediment of the Elizabeth River, VA, USA.

Savannah J Volkoff, Daniel L Rodriguez, David R Singleton, Alexander W McCumber, Michael D Aitken, Jill R Stewart, Claudia K Gunsch

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Application of Ozonation-Biodegradation Hybrid System for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Degradation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Savannah J VolkoffDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, 121 Hudson Hall, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Daniel L RodriguezDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, 121 Hudson Hall, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
David R SingletonDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, 121 Hudson Hall, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Alexander W McCumberDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, 121 Hudson Hall, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Michael D AitkenDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27759-7431, USA.
Jill R StewartDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27759-7431, USA.
Claudia K GunschDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, 121 Hudson Hall, Durham, NC, 27708, USA. ckgunsch@duke.edu.
Duke University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Zebrafish as a Detector of Organophosphate ExposureP42ES010356 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI AMY H HERRING · 2000 to 2026
$56.2M
National Science Foundation DGE-1545220NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES010356NIEHS NIH HHS P42ES010356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estuarine sediments near former creosoting facilities along the Elizabeth River (Virginia, USA) are contaminated by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). In this study, we interrogated the bacterial community of the Elizabeth River with both culture-based and culture-independent methods to identify potential candidates for bioremediation of these contaminants. DNA-based stable isotope probing (SIP) experiments with phenanthrene and fluoranthene using sediment from the former Republic Creosoting site identified relevant PAH-degrading bacteria within the Azoarcus, Hydrogenophaga, and Croceicoccus genera. Targeted cultivation of PAH-degrading bacteria from the same site recovered 6 PAH-degrading strains, including one strain highly similar to Hydrogenophaga sequences detected in SIP experiments. Other isolates were most similar to organisms within the Novosphingobium, Sphingobium, Stenotrophomonas, and Alcaligenes genera. Lastly, we performed 16S rRNA gene amplicon microbiome analyses of sediment samples from four sites, including Republic Creosoting, with varying concentrations of PAHs. Analysis of these data showed a striking divergence of the microbial community at the highly contaminated Republic Creosoting site from less contaminated sites with the enrichment of several bacterial clades including those affiliated with the Pseudomonas genus. Sequences within the microbiome libraries similar to SIP-derived sequences were generally found at high relative abundance, while the Croceicoccus sequence was present at low to moderate relative abundance. These results suggest that Azoarcus and Hydrogenophaga strains might be good target candidates for biostimulation, while Croceicoccus spp. might be good targets for bioaugmentation in these sediments. Furthermore, this study demonstrates the value of culture-based and culture-independent methods in identifying promising bacterial candidates for use in a precision bioremediation scheme. KEY POINTS: • This study highlights the importance of using multiple strategies to identify promising bacterial candidates for use in a precision bioremediation scheme. • We used both selective cultivation techniques and DNA-based stable isotope probing to identify bacterial degraders of prominent PAHs at a historically contaminated site in the Elizabeth River, VA, USA. • Azoarcus and Hydrogenophaga strains might be good target candidates for biostimulation in Elizabeth River sediments, while Croceicoccus spp. might be good targets for bioaugmentation.

Indexed as

Polycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsSoil PollutantsBacteriaBiodegradation, EnvironmentalGeologic SedimentsRiversRNA, Ribosomal, 16SPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil PollutantsBioaugmentationBioremediationCreosotePolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Identifiers

PMID35089401
PMCPMC9667532
OpenAlexW4210395694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.