Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35089385›Full record

ArticlePlant cell reports2022

Efficient production of transgene-free, gene-edited carrot plants via protoplast transformation.

Chandler M Meyer, Irwin L Goldman, Ewa Grzebelus, Patrick J Krysan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant cell reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. CRISPR/Cas system-mediated transgene-free or DNA-free genome editing in plants.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chandler M MeyerDepartment of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Irwin L GoldmanDepartment of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Ewa GrzebelusDepartment of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Horticulture, University of Agriculture in Krakow, al. 29 Listopada 54, 31-425, Kraków, Poland.
Patrick J KrysanDepartment of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, WI, 53706, USA. pjkrysan@wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4916-915X
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of Agriculture in Krakow · PLUniversity of Wisconsin System · US

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture GRANT12854173 /project accession no. 1021280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageWe have developed and validated an efficient protocol for producing gene-edited carrot plants that do not result in the stable incorporation of foreign DNA in the edited plant's genome. We report here a method for producing transgene-free, gene-edited carrot (Daucus carota subs. sativus) plants. With this approach, PEG-mediated transformation is used to transiently express a cytosine base editor and a guide RNA in protoplasts to induce targeted mutations in the carrot genome. These protoplasts are then cultured under conditions that lead to the production of somatic embryos which subsequently develop into carrot plants. For this study, we used the Centromere-Specific Histone H3 (CENH3) gene as a target for evaluating the efficiency with which regenerated, edited plants could be produced. After validating sgRNA performance and protoplast transformation efficiency using transient assays, we performed two independent editing experiments using sgRNAs targeting different locations within CENH3. In the first experiment, we analyzed 184 regenerated plants and found that 22 of them (11.9%) carried targeted mutations within CENH3, while in the second experiment, 28 out of 190 (14.7%) plants had mutations in CENH3. Of the 50 edited carrot lines that we analyzed, 43 were homozygous or bi-allelic for mutations in CENH3. No evidence of the base editor expression plasmid was found in the edited lines tested, indicating that this approach is able to produce transgene-free, gene-edited lines. The protocol that we describe provides an efficient method for easily generating large numbers of transgene-free, gene-edited carrot plants.

Indexed as

Daucus carotaGene EditingCRISPR-Cas SystemsGenome, PlantPlants, Genetically ModifiedProtoplastsCRISPR/Cas9Cytosine base editorDaucus carotaGenome editingProtoplastTransgene-free

Identifiers

PMID35089385
OpenAlexW4210800866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.