Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35089057›Full record

ArticleCirculation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology2022

Predicting Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence by Combining Population Data and Virtual Cohorts of Patient-Specific Left Atrial Models.

Caroline H Roney, Iain Sim, Jin Yu, Marianne Beach, Arihant Mehta, Jose Alonso Solis-Lemus, Irum Kotadia, John Whitaker, Cesare Corrado, Orod Razeghi and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Automated generation of ablation lesion masks: a unison of electro and optic flow mapping for persistent AF virtual cohorts.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Full-field surrogate modeling of cardiac electrophysiology encoding geometric variability.Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. A Left Atrial Positioning System to Enable Follow-up and Cohort Studies.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Applications of digital twins in medicine.Nature biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Caroline H RoneySchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom (C.H.R., I.S., J.Y., M.B., A.M., J.A.S.-L., I.K., J.W., C.C., O.R., M.O., S.E.W., S.A.N.).ORCID 0000-0001-6809-0928
Iain SimSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom (C.H.R., I.S., J.Y., M.B., A.M., J.A.S.-L., I.K., J.W., C.C., O.R., M.O., S.E.W., S.A.N.).ORCID 0000-0001-7090-4011
Jin YuSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom (C.H.R., I.S., J.Y., M.B., A.M., J.A.S.-L., I.K., J.W., C.C., O.R., M.O., S.E.W., S.A.N.).ORCID 0000-0003-1226-7848
Marianne BeachSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom (C.H.R., I.S., J.Y., M.B., A.M., J.A.S.-L., I.K., J.W., C.C., O.R., M.O., S.E.W., S.A.N.).ORCID 0000-0002-2971-1987
Arihant MehtaSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom (C.H.R., I.S., J.Y., M.B., A.M., J.A.S.-L., I.K., J.W., C.C., O.R., M.O., S.E.W., S.A.N.).ORCID 0000-0003-0503-8457
Jose Alonso Solis-LemusSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom (C.H.R., I.S., J.Y., M.B., A.M., J.A.S.-L., I.K., J.W., C.C., O.R., M.O., S.E.W., S.A.N.).ORCID 0000-0002-2596-7811
Irum KotadiaSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom (C.H.R., I.S., J.Y., M.B., A.M., J.A.S.-L., I.K., J.W., C.C., O.R., M.O., S.E.W., S.A.N.).
John WhitakerSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom (C.H.R., I.S., J.Y., M.B., A.M., J.A.S.-L., I.K., J.W., C.C., O.R., M.O., S.E.W., S.A.N.).ORCID 0000-0002-5361-5725
Cesare CorradoSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom (C.H.R., I.S., J.Y., M.B., A.M., J.A.S.-L., I.K., J.W., C.C., O.R., M.O., S.E.W., S.A.N.).
Orod RazeghiSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom (C.H.R., I.S., J.Y., M.B., A.M., J.A.S.-L., I.K., J.W., C.C., O.R., M.O., S.E.W., S.A.N.).ORCID 0000-0003-4989-5565
Edward VigmondIHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Fondation Bordeaux Université, France (E.V.).ORCID 0000-0003-1388-3589
Sanjiv M NarayanDepartment of Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA (S.M.N.).ORCID 0000-0001-7552-5053
Mark O'NeillSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom (C.H.R., I.S., J.Y., M.B., A.M., J.A.S.-L., I.K., J.W., C.C., O.R., M.O., S.E.W., S.A.N.).ORCID 0000-0002-6070-7177
Steven E WilliamsSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom (C.H.R., I.S., J.Y., M.B., A.M., J.A.S.-L., I.K., J.W., C.C., O.R., M.O., S.E.W., S.A.N.).ORCID 0000-0002-7266-2084
Steven A NiedererSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom (C.H.R., I.S., J.Y., M.B., A.M., J.A.S.-L., I.K., J.W., C.C., O.R., M.O., S.E.W., S.A.N.).ORCID 0000-0002-4612-6982
I.R.C.C.S. Oasi Maria SS · ITBrigham and Women's Hospital · USPalo Alto University · USQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversité de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

The Dynamics of Human Atrial FibrillationR01HL083359 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Sanjiv M Narayan · 2008 to 2026
$7.9M
Machine Learning in Atrial FibrillationR01HL149134 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NARAYAN, SANJIV M · 2020 to 2024
$3.8M
Using Atrial Mechanics To Identify Fibrosis In Patients with Atrial FibrillationR01HL152256 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ENNIS, DANIEL B · 2020 to 2023
$2.8M
British Heart Foundation FS/20/26/34952British Heart Foundation FS/CRTF/21/24166British Heart Foundation PG/13/37/30280British Heart Foundation PG/15/91/31812Medical Research Council MR/N001877/1Medical Research Council MR/S015086/1Medical Research Council MR/S015086/2NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL083359NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL149134NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL152256Wellcome Trust 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent ablation therapy for atrial fibrillation is suboptimal, and long-term response is challenging to predict. Clinical trials identify bedside properties that provide only modest prediction of long-term response in populations, while patient-specific models in small cohorts primarily explain acute response to ablation. We aimed to predict long-term atrial fibrillation recurrence after ablation in large cohorts, by using machine learning to complement biophysical simulations by encoding more interindividual variability.

methodsPatient-specific models were constructed for 100 atrial fibrillation patients (43 paroxysmal, 41 persistent, and 16 long-standing persistent), undergoing first ablation. Patients were followed for 1 year using ambulatory ECG monitoring. Each patient-specific biophysical model combined differing fibrosis patterns, fiber orientation maps, electrical properties, and ablation patterns to capture uncertainty in atrial properties and to test the ability of the tissue to sustain fibrillation. These simulation stress tests of different model variants were postprocessed to calculate atrial fibrillation simulation metrics. Machine learning classifiers were trained to predict atrial fibrillation recurrence using features from the patient history, imaging, and atrial fibrillation simulation metrics.

resultsWe performed 1100 atrial fibrillation ablation simulations across 100 patient-specific models. Models based on simulation stress tests alone showed a maximum accuracy of 0.63 for predicting long-term fibrillation recurrence. Classifiers trained to history, imaging, and simulation stress tests (average 10-fold cross-validation area under the curve, 0.85±0.09; recall, 0.80±0.13; precision, 0.74±0.13) outperformed those trained to history and imaging (area under the curve, 0.66±0.17) or history alone (area under the curve, 0.61±0.14).

conclusionA novel computational pipeline accurately predicted long-term atrial fibrillation recurrence in individual patients by combining outcome data with patient-specific acute simulation response. This technique could help to personalize selection for atrial fibrillation ablation.

Indexed as

Atrial Function, LeftAtrial RemodelingHeart RateMachine LearningModels, CardiovascularPatient-Specific ModelingAction PotentialsAtrial FibrillationCatheter AblationElectrocardiography, AmbulatoryFibrosisHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRecurrenceRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsatrial fibrillationbenchmarkingexercise testmachine learninguncertainty

Identifiers

PMID35089057
PMCPMC8845531
OpenAlexW4210357601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.