Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35088855›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2022

DNA-free CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing of wild tetraploid tomato Solanum peruvianum using protoplast regeneration.

Choun-Sea Lin, Chen-Tran Hsu, Yu-Hsuan Yuan, Po-Xing Zheng, Fu-Hui Wu, Qiao-Wei Cheng, Yu-Lin Wu, Ting-Li Wu, Steven Lin, Jin-Jun Yue and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. From Lab to Field: CRISPRing Major CultivatedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Efficient CRISPR/Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. DNA-free CRISPR genome editing in raspberry (Frontiers in genome editing · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Choun-Sea LinAgricultural Biotechnology Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9566-2952
Chen-Tran HsuAgricultural Biotechnology Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan.
Yu-Hsuan YuanAgricultural Biotechnology Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan.
Po-Xing ZhengAgricultural Biotechnology Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5827-5865
Fu-Hui WuAgricultural Biotechnology Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan.
Qiao-Wei ChengAgricultural Biotechnology Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan.
Yu-Lin WuAgricultural Biotechnology Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan.
Ting-Li WuAgricultural Biotechnology Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan.
Steven LinInstitute of Biochemistry, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5005-5518
Jin-Jun YueResearch Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou 311, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9606-6394
Ying-Huey ChengPlant Pathology Division, Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute, Taichung 413, Taiwan.
Shu-I LinDepartment of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7542-4663
Ming-Che ShihAgricultural Biotechnology Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7590-793X
Jen SheenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8970-9267
Yao-Cheng LinAgricultural Biotechnology Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-9390-795X
Agricultural Biotechnology Research Center, Academia Sinica · TWNational Taiwan University · TWChinese Academy of Forestry · CNHarvard University · US

Funding

Plant Nutrient-Growth Signaling NetworkR01GM129093 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SHEEN, JEN · 2018 to 2025
$2.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM129093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wild tomatoes (Solanum peruvianum) are important genomic resources for tomato research and breeding. Development of a foreign DNA-free clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-Cas delivery system has potential to mitigate public concern about genetically modified organisms. Here, we established a DNA-free CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing system based on an optimized protoplast regeneration protocol of S. peruvianum, an important resource for tomato introgression breeding. We generated mutants for genes involved in small interfering RNAs biogenesis, RNA-DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE 6 (SpRDR6), and SUPPRESSOR OF GENE SILENCING 3 (SpSGS3); pathogen-related peptide precursors, PATHOGENESIS-RELATED PROTEIN-1 (SpPR-1) and PROSYSTEMIN (SpProSys); and fungal resistance (MILDEW RESISTANT LOCUS O, SpMlo1) using diploid or tetraploid protoplasts derived from in vitro-grown shoots. The ploidy level of these regenerants was not affected by PEG-Ca2+-mediated transfection, CRISPR reagents, or the target genes. By karyotyping and whole genome sequencing analysis, we confirmed that CRISPR-Cas9 editing did not introduce chromosomal changes or unintended genome editing sites. All mutated genes in both diploid and tetraploid regenerants were heritable in the next generation. spsgs3 null T0 regenerants and sprdr6 null T1 progeny had wiry, sterile phenotypes in both diploid and tetraploid lines. The sterility of the spsgs3 null mutant was partially rescued, and fruits were obtained by grafting to wild-type (WT) stock and pollination with WT pollen. The resulting seeds contained the mutated alleles. Tomato yellow leaf curl virus proliferated at higher levels in spsgs3 and sprdr6 mutants than in the WT. Therefore, this protoplast regeneration technique should greatly facilitate tomato polyploidization and enable the use of CRISPR-Cas for S. peruvianum domestication and tomato breeding.

Indexed as

SolanumSolanum lycopersicumCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGenome, PlantPlant BreedingProtoplastsRegenerationTetraploidy

Identifiers

PMID35088855
PMCPMC8968427
OpenAlexW4210646185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.