Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35088816›Full record

ArticleActa odontologica latinoamericana : AOL2021

Shaping ability of reciprocating and rotary systems in oval-shaped root canals: a microcomputed tomography study.

Thamires C de Medeiros, Carolina O de Lima, Ana Flávia A Barbosa, Carla M Augusto, Adília Maria V Bruno, Ricardo T Lopes, Pablo A Amoroso-Silva, Marília Fv Marceliano-Alves

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thamires C de MedeirosUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Endodontia, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Carolina O de LimaUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Endodontia, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Ana Flávia A BarbosaUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Endodontia, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Carla M AugustoUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Endodontia, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Adília Maria V BrunoUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Endodontia, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Ricardo T LopesUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Programa de Engenharia Nuclear, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Pablo A Amoroso-SilvaUniversidade Iguaçu, Departamento de Endodontia e Pesquisa Odontológica, Nova Iguaçu, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Marília Fv Marceliano-AlvesUniversidade Iguaçu, Departamento de Endodontia e Pesquisa Odontológica, Nova Iguaçu, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. mmarceliano@hotmail.com.
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Iguaçu · BR

Funding

Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared the shaping ability of single-file reciprocating (WaveOne Gold) and multifile rotary (Mtwo) systems on mandibular oval-shaped canine root canals, using microcomputed tomography (micro-CT). Thirty mandibular canines were scanned by micro-CT and assigned to one of two groups (n=15) according to the system used for root canal preparation: WaveOne Gold or Mtwo. After preparation, the teeth were rescanned, and the percentage of untouched canal area, apical transportation and centering ability were analyzed. The data was evaluated using Kruskal and Mann- Whitney tests (p<0.05). No difference was found in percentage of unprepared canal area between groups in the entire root canal or the apical third, or in centering ability (p>0.05). WaveOne gold had less canal transportation than MTwo at the 5 mm section (p<0.05). WOG and Mtwo systems presented similar shaping ability and centering ability in oval-shaped canals. However, WOG presented less transportation than Mtwo at 5 mm from the apex.

Indexed as

Dental Pulp CavityMolarEquipment DesignRoot Canal PreparationX-Ray Microtomographyanatomyroot canal preparationtoothx-ray microtomography

Identifiers

PMID35088816
PMCPMC10315089
OpenAlexW4210722556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.