Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35088619›Full record

ArticleJournal of mental health (Abingdon, England)2022

Assessing a digital peer support self-management intervention for adults with serious mental illness: feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness.

Karen L Fortuna, Amanda L Myers, Joelle Ferron, Arya Kadakia, Cynthia Bianco, Martha L Bruce, Stephen J Bartels

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mental health (Abingdon, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic Review of Loneliness and Social Isolation Interventions in Obesity and Obesity-Related Complications.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karen L FortunaDepartment of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
Amanda L MyersRivier University, Nashua, NH, USA.
Joelle FerronDepartment of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
Arya KadakiaDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH, USA.
Cynthia BiancoDepartment of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
Martha L BruceDepartment of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
Stephen J BartelsThe Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Dartmouth College · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USRivier University · US

Funding

Peer-Delivered and Technology-Assisted Integrated Illness Management and RecoveryK01MH117496 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK CLINIC · PI FORTUNA, KAREN L. · 2019 to 2023
$615k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH117496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of digital peer support integrated medical and psychiatric self-management intervention ("PeerTECH") for adults with a serious mental illness.

methodsTwenty-one adults with a chart diagnosis of a serious mental illness (i.e., schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, or treatment-refractory major depressive disorder) and at least one medical comorbidity (i.e., cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, and/or high cholesterol) aged 18 years and older received the PeerTECH intervention in the community. Nine peer support specialists were trained to deliver PeerTECH. Data were collected at baseline and 12-weeks.

resultsThis pilot study demonstrated that a 12-week, digital peer support integrated medical and psychiatric self-management intervention for adults with serious mental illness was feasible and acceptable among peer support specialists and patients and was associated with statistically significant improvements in self-efficacy to manage chronic disease and personal empowerment. In addition, pre/post non-statistically significant improvements were observed in psychiatric self-management, medical self-management skills, and feelings of loneliness.

conclusionsThis single-arm pre/post pilot study demonstrated preliminary evidence peer support specialists could offer a fidelity-adherent digital peer support self-management intervention to adults with serious mental illness. These findings build on the evidence that a digital peer support self-management intervention for adults with serious mental illness designed to improve medical and psychiatric self-management is feasible, acceptable, and shows promising evidence of improvements in clinical outcomes. The use of technology among peer support specialists may be a promising tool to facilitate the delivery of peer support

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderMental DisordersSelf-ManagementAdultFeasibility StudiesHumansPilot ProjectsmHealthPeer supportself-managementserious mental illness

Identifiers

PMID35088619
PMCPMC9329481
OpenAlexW4210458084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.