Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35088605›Full record

ArticleDementia (London, England)2022

Dementia-friendly communities: The involvement of people living with dementia.

Elspeth Mathie, Arthur Antony, Anne Killett, Nicole Darlington, Stefanie Buckner, Louise Lafortune, Andrea Mayrhofer, Angela Dickinson, Michael Woodward, Claire Goodman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A University's Role in Developing a Regional Network of Dementia Friendly Communities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Collaboration for Developing and Sustaining Community Dementia-Friendly Initiatives: A Realist Evaluation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  8. [Artificial intelligence and ethics in healthcare-balancing act or symbiosis?]Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elspeth Mathie3769University of Hertfordshire, Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5871-436X
Arthur Antony6106University of East Anglia, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Norwich, Norfolk, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8617-5714
Anne Killett6106University of East Anglia, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Norwich, Norfolk, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4080-8365
Nicole Darlington8018University of Hertfordshire, Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, College Lane, Hatfield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2505-1256
Stefanie Buckner2152University of Cambridge, Cambridge Public Health, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6820-7057
Louise Lafortune2152University of Cambridge, Cambridge Public Health, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9018-1217
Andrea Mayrhofer5994Newcastle University, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0606-2865
Angela DickinsonUniversity of Hertfordshire, Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.
Michael WoodwardUniversity of East Anglia, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Claire GoodmanUniversity of Hertfordshire, Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, College Lane, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8938-4893

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDementia Friendly Communities (DFCs) offer an approach to community engagement to improve the lives of people living with dementia and their family supporters. The involvement of those living with dementia is key to creating successful DFCs. This paper examines how people affected by dementia were involved in developing and designing DFCs in England, and the impact of their involvement.

methodsThis study used a mixed method case study design in six DFCs in England. Data collection involved documentary analysis, a survey, and interviews and focus groups with service providers and people living with dementia and their supporters.

findingsAll six DFCs aspired to involve people living with dementia and their family supporters, but often relied on a small number of people living with dementia. The range of involvement activities in DFCs included Steering Group meetings, wider public consultations, and enabling feedback through data collection methods such as surveys and 'ad hoc' conversations. Organisations within the DFCs with experience of public consultation offered structured opportunities for involvement. There was no evidence of people living with dementia initiating or co-leading the organisation, its direction and/or the activities of the DFCs.

conclusionThe involvement of people living with dementia in DFCs went beyond rhetoric, with some evidence of context sensitive and meaningful participation. Approaches towards involvement should focus on involvement in strategic planning, and on harnessing expertise in delivering different involvement activities to optimise participation of a greater breadth of people living with dementia. Engagement with local organisations who work with, and for, people living with dementia, and dedicating the resources needed for involvement work, are crucial for creating DFCs. The success of DFCs are determined by how the needs of people living with dementia are identified, discussed and reviewed by those within the community who are most affected.

Indexed as

DementiaEnglandFocus GroupsHumansResearch DesignSurveys and Questionnairesdementiadementia friendly communitiesinvolvementpeople living with dementiapublic engagement

Identifiers

PMID35088605
PMCPMC9109212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.