Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35088285›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

Genotoxicity assessment in two Amazonian estuaries using the Plagioscion squamosissimus as a biomonitor.

Claudia Antonia Campos Rodrigues de Oliveira, Paulo Sérgio Dos Santos Souto, Dulcidéia da Conceição Palheta, Marcelo de Oliveira Bahia, Lorena da AraújoCunha, Maria de Lourdes Souza Santos, Tatiane do Nascimento Medeiros Rodrigues, Bianca Bentes

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Claudia Antonia Campos Rodrigues de OliveiraUniversidade Federal Do Pará, Núcleo de Ecologia Aquática E Pesca, Rua Augusto Corrêa, S/N Guamá, CEP: 66075-110, Belém, Pará, Brasil. claudia.engpesca@yahoo.com.br.
Paulo Sérgio Dos Santos SoutoUniversidade Federal Rural da Amazônia, Instituto de Saúde E Produção Animal-ISPA, Avenida Presidente Tancredo Neves, 2501Bairro: Terra Firme, CEP: 66077-830, Belém, Pará, Brasil.
Dulcidéia da Conceição PalhetaUniversidade Federal Rural da Amazônia, Instituto de Saúde E Produção Animal-ISPA, Avenida Presidente Tancredo Neves, 2501Bairro: Terra Firme, CEP: 66077-830, Belém, Pará, Brasil.
Marcelo de Oliveira BahiaCentro de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Patologia. Av. Augusto Correa, 01; Laboratório de Citogenética Humana e Genética Toxicológica, Universidade Federal Do Pará, , Guamá, CEP: 66075110, Belém, Pará, Brasil.
Lorena da AraújoCunhaCentro de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Patologia. Av. Augusto Correa, 01; Laboratório de Citogenética Humana e Genética Toxicológica, Universidade Federal Do Pará, , Guamá, CEP: 66075110, Belém, Pará, Brasil.
Maria de Lourdes Souza SantosLaboratório de Química Ambiental, Avenida Presidente Tancredo Neves, Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia, 2501 Terra Firme, CEP: 66077-830, Belém, Pará, Brasil.
Tatiane do Nascimento Medeiros RodriguesUniversidade Federal Do Pará, Núcleo de Ecologia Aquática E Pesca, Rua Augusto Corrêa, S/N Guamá, CEP: 66075-110, Belém, Pará, Brasil.
Bianca BentesUniversidade Federal Do Pará, Núcleo de Ecologia Aquática E Pesca, Rua Augusto Corrêa, S/N Guamá, CEP: 66075-110, Belém, Pará, Brasil.
Universidade Federal do Pará · BRUniversidade Federal Rural da Amazônia · BR

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genotoxicity studies in coastal ecosystems have been a priority in Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA). This research aimed to study the genotoxicity by the micronucleus test and comet assay in two Brazilian Amazon estuaries (anthropized and control) using Plagioscion squamosissimus as a biomonitor. Blood samples were collected from 54 specimens. No significant genotoxic effects were detected in the cells analyzed, although the highest occurrence (MN and DNA damages) was observed in anthropized site. The percentage of genomic damage differed between the sites studied, being always higher in anthropizes site as well. Of the nucleoids analyzed in this site, on average, 28 ± 14.42% of the cells were classified in the highest damage class. The fish analyzed in the present study are direct influenced of xenobiont agents capable of producing damage to the genetic material of aquatic organisms in both sites and, consequently, may bring consequences still little reported in studies of morphophysiological alterations in humans.

Indexed as

EstuariesPerciformesAnimalsComet AssayDNA DamageEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringMicronucleus TestsBrazilian Amazon estuariesComet assayEnvironmental toxicologyGenotoxicityMicronucleiXenobiotic agents

Identifiers

PMID35088285
PMCPMC8794734
OpenAlexW4210749915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.