Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35088143›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2022

How-I-do-it: minimally invasive repair of ileal conduit parastomal hernias.

M Dewulf, P Pletinckx, F Nachtergaele, F Ameye, P Dekuyper, N Hildebrand, Filip Muysoms

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Robotic sugarbaker parastomal hernia repair: updated series and outcomes.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M DewulfDepartment of Surgery, Maria Middelares, Buitenring Sint-Denijs 30, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
P PletinckxDepartment of Surgery, Maria Middelares, Buitenring Sint-Denijs 30, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
F NachtergaeleDepartment of Surgery, Maria Middelares, Buitenring Sint-Denijs 30, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
F AmeyeDepartment of Urology, Maria Middelares, Ghent, Belgium.
P DekuyperDepartment of Urology, Maria Middelares, Ghent, Belgium.
N HildebrandDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Filip MuysomsDepartment of Surgery, Maria Middelares, Buitenring Sint-Denijs 30, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. filip.muysoms@azmmsj.be.
AZ Maria Middelares · BEMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParastomal hernia after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion is an underestimated and undertreated condition with significant impact on quality of life. However, its surgical treatment is challenging and prone to complications and the optimal surgical treatment of this condition remains to be determined.

methodsIn this article, we describe our surgical techniques in the minimally invasive treatment of ileal conduit parastomal hernia and present our preliminary results. In a retrospective single-center design, a prospectively maintained database was screened. Data from all patients undergoing surgical treatment for a parastomal hernia after cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion in our center were collected.

resultsBetween May 2016 and June 2020, 15 patients underwent minimally invasive repair of a parastomal hernia of an ileal conduit. Details on the surgical approach are provided, along with a flow chart to standardize the choice of surgical technique, depending on the presence of a concomitant midline incisional hernia and perioperative findings. The majority of patients were treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (10/15; 66.7%). Median postoperative hospital stay was 5 days. One-third of patients developed a postoperative urinary infection. Median follow-up was 366 days. One patient developed a local recurrence of her parastomal hernia on day 66 postoperatively, treated with intraperitoneal mesh.

conclusionThe minimally invasive surgical treatment of a parastomal hernia after ileal conduit urinary diversion poses specific perioperative challenges that require a broad surgical armamentarium and a tailored approach. Preliminary results confirm a significant morbidity after this type of surgery.

Indexed as

Incisional HerniaSurgical StomasUrinary DiversionFemaleHumansQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesSurgical MeshBricker urostomyCystectomyIleal conduitParastomal hernia

Identifiers

PMID35088143
OpenAlexW4210821054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.