Observational studyCalcified tissue international2022
Clinical and Radiologic Response of Central Giant Cell Granuloma to Denosumab: A 6-Year Prospective Observational Study.
Observational study in Calcified tissue international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- The use of denosumab in rare bone diseases in adults: a systematic review from the ECTS Rare Bone Disease Action Group.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Pooled it
- Rebound hypercalcemia after denosumab cessation during follow-up after surgical treatment for parathyroid carcinoma: case report and literature review.Archives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2024Pooled it
- Denosumab in Giant Cell Rich Tumors of Bone: An Open-Label Multicenter Phase II Study.The oncologist · 2023Trial
- Article
- Evaluating Treatment Modalities for Reducing Recurrence in Central Giant Cell Granuloma: A Narrative Review.Dentistry journal · 2024Review
- Denosumab as treatment of central giant cell granuloma of the jaws. a scoping review.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2024Article
- Pharmacological therapy for central giant cell granuloma of the jaws: A systematic review.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2024Review
- Multiple central giant cell granuloma of the jaws: diagnostic signposts of Noonan syndrome and RASopathy.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2024Article
- Current concepts in targeted therapies for benign tumors of the jaw - A review of the literature.Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery · 2023Review
- Denosumab in pediatric bone disorders and the role of RANKL blockade: a narrative review.Translational pediatrics · 2023Review
- Osteoclast Recycling and the Rebound Phenomenon Following Denosumab Discontinuation.Current osteoporosis reports · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) is a rare lesion of the jaw occurring in young adults and adolescents. Surgery, the traditional mainstay of therapy, is associated with significant morbidity. Denosumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody to RANKL, is effective in a related entity, giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB), but experience in the more indolent CGCG is limited. This prospective observational study of all denosumab-treated CGCG at a tertiary referral centre (2015-2021) aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy and recurrence risk using denosumab in CGCG at lower-frequency dosing than used for GCTB. All received standardised, time-limited courses of denosumab 120 mg with stepwise increase in dosing interval based on response. They were followed for up to 75 months using a radiation-minimising protocol: 3-monthly clinical, biochemical and radiological assessment (orthopantomograms, cone beam CT). Eight patients, median age 20.5 years [IQR 6], received 13 initial doses [IQR 10] of denosumab 120 mg. Radiologic response was seen after 5.5 doses [IQR 4.5]: ossification in all and size reduction in three. Recurrence occurred in four of seven completing therapy, observed 12 months post-cessation [IQR 6.5]. Larger baseline size, aggressive subtype and fewer than 12 initial doses were more common in the recurrence group. There was no osteonecrosis of the jaw. Hypocalcaemia occurred in one receiving modified dosing. This study represents the largest, most diverse cohort of denosumab-treated CGCG with the longest follow-up in literature. It demonstrates the efficacy of lower-frequency, time-restricted course of denosumab but highlights the risk of recurrence. Long-term follow-up is critical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.