Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35088108›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2022

Safety profile of COVID-19 drugs in a real clinical setting.

Mei Nee Chiu, Maitry Bhardwaj, Sangeeta Pilkhwal Sah

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Favipiravir for treating COVID-19.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Diarrhea and Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection.Gastroenterology clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Multiple Sclerosis Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mei Nee ChiuUniversity Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Panjab University, Chandigarh, 160014, India.
Maitry BhardwajUniversity Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Panjab University, Chandigarh, 160014, India.
Sangeeta Pilkhwal SahUniversity Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Panjab University, Chandigarh, 160014, India. spilkhwal@rediffmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0264-489X
Panjab University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus has affected millions all over the world and has been declared pandemic, as of 11 March 2020. In addition to the ongoing research and development of vaccines, there is still a dire need for safe and effective drugs for the control and treatment against the SARS-CoV-2 virus infection. Numerous repurposed drugs are under clinical investigations whose reported adverse events can raise worries about their safety. The aim of this review is to illuminate the associated adverse events related to the drugs used in a real COVID-19 setting along with their relevant mechanism(s).

methodThrough a literature search conducted on PubMed and Google Scholar database, various adverse events suspected to be induced by eight drugs, including dexamethasone, hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, remdesivir, favipiravir, lopinavir/ritonavir, ivermectin, and tocilizumab, administered in COVID-19 patients in clinical practice and studies were identified in 30 case reports, 3 case series, and 10 randomized clinical trials.

resultsMild, moderate, or severe adverse events of numerous repurposed and investigational drugs caused by various factors and mechanisms were observed. Gastrointestinal side effects such as nausea, abdominal cramps, diarrhea, and vomiting were the most frequently followed by cardiovascular, cutaneous, and hepatic adverse events. Few other rare adverse drug reactions were also observed.

conclusionIn light of their ineffectiveness against COVID-19 as evident in large clinical studies, drugs including hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, and ivermectin should neither be used routinely nor in clinical studies. While lack of sufficient data, it creates doubt regarding the reliability of chloroquine and favipiravir use in COVID-19 patients. Hence, these two drugs can only be used in clinical studies. In contrast, ample well-conducted studies have approved the use of remdesivir, tocilizumab, and dexamethasone under certain conditions in COVID-19 patients. Consequently, it is significant to establish a strong surveillance system in order to monitor the proper safety and toxicity profile of the potential anti-COVID-19 drugs with good clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsAntiviral AgentsChloroquineDexamethasoneHumansHydroxychloroquineIvermectinLopinavirReproducibility of ResultsRitonavirSARS-CoV-2Antiviral AgentsChloroquineDexamethasoneHydroxychloroquineIvermectinLopinavirRitonavirAdverse drug reactionsAdverse eventsCOVID-19Pharmacovigilance

Identifiers

PMID35088108
PMCPMC8794611
OpenAlexW4210430072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.