ArticleFrontiers in medicine2021
Management of Medico-Legal Risks in Digital Health Era: A Scoping Review.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Potentiality of algorithms and artificial intelligence adoption to improve medication management in primary care: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2023Pooled it
- Legal and ethical responsibility for AI-assisted diagnostic and referral errors: a scoping review of comparative approaches with implications for Saudi healthcare.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Imaging pathways in spondyloarthritis: integrating radiography, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, low-dose computed tomography, and artificial intelligence methods : Radiology and AI in SpA.Rheumatology international · 2025Review
- Bioinformatics in Neonatal/Pediatric Medicine-A Literature Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Scoping Review Shows the Dynamics and Complexities Inherent to the Notion of "Responsibility" in Artificial Intelligence within the Healthcare Context.Asian bioethics review · 2024Article
- Evaluation of awareness and performance towards COVID-related disinfectant use: a comparative study between Jordan and United Arab Emirates.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Perception of primary care doctors towards telemedicine in Kuching, Sarawak: A cross-sectional study.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2024Article
- Immersive interfaces for clinical applications: current status and future perspective.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2024Review
- Robotics and AI into healthcare from the perspective of European regulation: who is responsible for medical malpractice?Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Clinicians' Views on Using Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Opportunities, Challenges, and Beyond.Cureus · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence in forensic medicine and forensic dentistry.The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology · 2023Review
- Multiomic Investigations into Lung Health and Disease.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Evaluation of awareness and performance towards COVID-related disinfectant use among the university communities in Lebanon.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Unleashing the potential of AI for pathology: challenges and recommendations.The Journal of pathology · 2023Review
- A bioinformatics approach towards bronchopulmonary dysplasia.Translational pediatrics · 2023Review
- Telemedicine Support for Primary Care Providers versus Usual Care in Patients with Heart Failure: Protocol of a Pragmatic Cluster Randomised Trial within the Brazilian Heart Insufficiency with Telemedicine (BRAHIT) Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Can Artificial Intelligence Enhance Syncope Management?: AJACC. Advances · 2023Review
- Effects of and Prospects for the Hierarchical Medical Policy in Beijing, China.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence needs big data to develop reliable predictions. Therefore, storing and processing health data is essential for the new diagnostic and decisional technologies but, at the same time, represents a risk for privacy protection. This scoping review is aimed at underlying the medico-legal and ethical implications of the main artificial intelligence applications to healthcare, also focusing on the issues of the COVID-19 era. Starting from a summary of the United States (US) and European Union (EU) regulatory frameworks, the current medico-legal and ethical challenges are discussed in general terms before focusing on the specific issues regarding informed consent, medical malpractice/cognitive biases, automation and interconnectedness of medical devices, diagnostic algorithms and telemedicine. We aim at underlying that education of physicians on the management of this (new) kind of clinical risks can enhance compliance with regulations and avoid legal risks for the healthcare professionals and institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.