Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35087779›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2021

Accuracy and Timeliness of Knowledge Dissemination on COVID-19 Among People in Rural and Remote Regions of China at the Early Stage of Outbreak.

Wen Zhou, Leshui He, Xuanhua Nie, Taoketaohu Wuri, Jinhai Piao, Dunshan Chen, Hui Gao, Jianmin Liu, Kyedrub Tubden, Ming He and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Wen ZhouSchool of Ethnology and Sociology, Yunnan University, Kunming, China.
Leshui HeDepartment of Economics, Bates College, Lewiston, ME, United States.
Xuanhua NieSchool of Ethnology and Sociology, Yunnan University, Kunming, China.
Taoketaohu WuriCollege of Ethnology and Anthropology, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot, China.
Jinhai PiaoInstitute of Ethnic Studies, Yanbian University, Yanbian, China.
Dunshan ChenCenter for Collaborative Innovation in the Heritage and Development of Xizang Culture, Xizang Minzu University, Xianyang, China.
Hui GaoSchool of Political Science and Laws, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China.
Jianmin LiuCollege of Ethnology and Sociology, Guangxi University for Nationalities, Nanning, China.
Kyedrub TubdenTibet's Economic and Cultural Research Center, Tibet University, Lhasa, China.
Ming HeSchool of Ethnology and Sociology, Yunnan University, Kunming, China.
Jun HeSchool of Ethnology and Sociology, Yunnan University, Kunming, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spread throughout China in January 2020. To contain the virus outbreak, the Chinese government took extraordinary measures in terms of public policy, wherein accurate and timely dissemination of information plays a crucial role. Despite all of the efforts toward studying this health emergency, little is known about the effectiveness of public policies that support health communication during such a crisis to disseminate knowledge for self-protection. Particularly, we focus on the accuracy and timeliness of knowledge dissemination on COVID-19 among people in remote regions-a topic largely omitted in existing research. In February 2020, at the early-stages of the COVID-19 outbreak, a questionnaire survey was carried out. In total, 8,520 participants from seven less economically developed provinces situated in the borderlands of China with large ethnic minority groups responded. We analyzed the data through poisson regression and logistic regression analyses. We found that (1) people in remote regions of China obtained accurate information on COVID-19. Further, they were able to take appropriate measures to protect themselves. (2) Result from both descriptive analysis and multivariable regression analysis revealed that there is no large difference in the accuracy of information among groups. (3) Older, less educated, and rural respondents received information with a significant delay, whereas highly educated, younger, urban residents and those who obtained information through online media were more likely to have received the news of the outbreak sooner and to be up to date on the information. This research provides evidence that disadvantage people in remote regions obtained accurate and essential information required to act in an appropriate manner in responses to the COVID-19 outbreak. However, they obtained knowledge on COVID-19 at a slower pace than other people; thus, further improvement in the timely dissemination of information among disadvantage people in remote regions is warranted.

Indexed as

COVID-19ChinaDisease OutbreaksEthnic and Racial MinoritiesEthnicityHumansMinority GroupsSARS-CoV-2communication inequalityCOVID-19disadvantage groupsinfectious diseasesrisk communication

Identifiers

PMID35087779
PMCPMC8787119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.