Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35087676›Full record

ArticlePsychologica Belgica2022

Intimate Relationships in Times of COVID-19: A Descriptive Study of Belgian Partners and their Perceived Well-Being.

Laura Sels, Sarah Galdiolo, Justine Gaugue, Marie Geonet, Pauline Verhelst, Claudia Chiarolanza, Ashley K Randall, Lesley Verhofstadt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychologica Belgica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura SelsFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, UGent, BE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3485-9599
Sarah GaldioloDepartment of Clinical Psychology, UMONS, BE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8912-3116
Justine GaugueDepartment of Clinical Psychology, UMONS, BE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4511-0660
Marie GeonetPsychological Sciences Research Institute, UCLouvain, BE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2007-7764
Pauline VerhelstFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, UGent, BE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2410-4093
Claudia ChiarolanzaDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies - Sapienza University of Rome, BE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8726-4724
Ashley K RandallCounseling and Counseling Psychology, Arizona State University, BE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3794-4163
Lesley VerhofstadtFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, UGent, BE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How did couples in Belgium cope during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic? In this study, grounded in relationship science, we investigated in a descriptive manner several factors that could affect how couples perceived individual and relational wellbeing during this time. Specifically, we examined the associations between gender, sexual orientation, parental status, and relationship duration on participants' self-reported individual and relational well-being after the first lockdown (more generally and more specific in response to COVID-19). Additionally, we investigated if relational well-being predicted perceived change in individual well-being from pre- to post-COVID-19 regulations. To test these hypotheses, self-report data was collected during the Summer of 2020 in both the Dutch and French speaking part of Belgium. Data from 679 participants suggested that individual and relational well-being only differed based on parental status (and not by gender nor sexual orientation). Importantly, parents reported lower relational well-being than participants without children, while participants without children reported higher perceived increases in depression. People that had been in a relationship for longer also reported lower relational well-being, but this relationship was explained by other confounding factors. Relational well-being buffered increases in individual distress that people perceived to have occurred pre-COVID-19 regulations to after COVID-19 regulations went into effect. These findings might inform practice and policy for individuals in a romantic relationship during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19intimate relationshipsrelationship qualitywellbeing

Identifiers

PMID35087676
PMCPMC8757384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.