ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2022
Fusion-Based Deep Learning with Nature-Inspired Algorithm for Intracerebral Haemorrhage Diagnosis.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intracranial hemorrhage segmentation and classification framework in computer tomography images using deep learning techniques.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Hyperparameter tuned deep learning-driven medical image analysis for intracranial hemorrhage detection.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Midpalatal Suture CBCT Image Quantitive Characteristics Analysis Based on Machine Learning Algorithm Construction and Optimization.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Analysis of the Model for Sports Enhancing Human Health Using Data Mining.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- Research on Camouflaged Human Target Detection Based on Deep Learning.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natural computing refers to computational processes observed in nature and human-designed computing inspired by nature. In recent times, data fusion in the healthcare sector becomes a challenging issue, and it needs to be resolved. At the same time, intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is the injury of blood vessels on the brain cells, which is mainly liable for stroke. X-rays and computed tomography (CT) scans are widely applied for locating the haemorrhage position and size. Since manual segmentation of the CT scans by planimetry by the use of radiologists is a time-consuming process, deep learning (DL) is used to attain effective ICH diagnosis performance. This paper presents an automated intracerebral haemorrhage diagnosis using fusion-based deep learning with swarm intelligence (AICH-FDLSI) algorithm. The AICH-FDLSI model operates on four major stages namely preprocessing, image segmentation, feature extraction, and classification. To begin with, the input image is preprocessed using the median filtering (MF) technique to remove the noise present in the image. Next, the seagull optimization algorithm (SOA) with Otsu multilevel thresholding is employed for image segmentation. In addition, the fusion-based feature extraction model using the Capsule Network (CapsNet) and EfficientNet is applied to extract a useful set of features. Moreover, deer hunting optimization (DHO) algorithm is utilized for the hyperparameter optimization of the CapsNet and DenseNet models. Finally, a fuzzy support vector machine (FSVM) is applied as a classification technique to identify the different classes of ICH. A set of simulations takes place to determine the diagnostic performance of the AICH-FDLSI model using the benchmark intracranial haemorrhage data set. The experimental outcome stated that the AICH-FDLSI model has reached a proficient performance over the compared methods in a significant way.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.