Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35087542›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021

Response to Early Generation Genomic Selection for Yield in Wheat.

David Bonnett, Yongle Li, Jose Crossa, Susanne Dreisigacker, Bhoja Basnet, Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez, G Alvarado, J L Jannink, Jesse Poland, Mark Sorrells

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluating reaction norm and fixed effect models for genomic selection of end-use quality in wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Drought-tolerant wheat for enhancing global food security.Functional & integrative genomics · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Optimizing selection based on BLUPs or BLUEs in multiple sets of genotypes differing in their population parameters.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

David BonnettInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, Texcoco, Mexico.
Yongle LiSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Faculty of Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Jose CrossaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, Texcoco, Mexico.
Susanne DreisigackerInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, Texcoco, Mexico.
Bhoja BasnetInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, Texcoco, Mexico.
Paulino Pérez-RodríguezColegio de Postgraduados, Texcoco, Mexico.
G AlvaradoInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, Texcoco, Mexico.
J L JanninkUSDA-ARS, Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Jesse PolandDepartment of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Mark SorrellsPlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated increasing genetic gain for grain yield using early generation genomic selection (GS). A training set of 1,334 elite wheat breeding lines tested over three field seasons was used to generate Genomic Estimated Breeding Values (GEBVs) for grain yield under irrigated conditions applying markers and three different prediction methods: (1) Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor (GBLUP), (2) GBLUP with the imputation of missing genotypic data by Ridge Regression BLUP (rrGBLUP_imp), and (3) Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space (RKHS) a.k.a. Gaussian Kernel (GK). F2 GEBVs were generated for 1,924 individuals from 38 biparental cross populations between 21 parents selected from the training set. Results showed that F2 GEBVs from the different methods were not correlated. Experiment 1 consisted of selecting F2s with the highest average GEBVs and advancing them to form genomically selected bulks and make intercross populations aiming to combine favorable alleles for yield. F4:6 lines were derived from genomically selected bulks, intercrosses, and conventional breeding methods with similar numbers from each. Results of field-testing for Experiment 1 did not find any difference in yield with genomic compared to conventional selection. Experiment 2 compared the predictive ability of the different GEBV calculation methods in F2 using a set of single plant-derived F2:4 lines from randomly selected F2 plants. Grain yield results from Experiment 2 showed a significant positive correlation between observed yields of F2:4 lines and predicted yield GEBVs of F2 single plants from GK (the predictive ability of 0.248,

Indexed as

breeding methodologyearly generation genomic selectionlinear and non-linear kernels genomic matricesresponse to selectionwheat breeding

Identifiers

PMID35087542
PMCPMC8787636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.