ArticleBreeding science2021
Potential application of simple easy-to-use insertion-deletion (InDel) markers in citrus cultivar identification.
Article in Breeding science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a DNA marker for cultivar identification of "Harushizuka", a new satsuma mandarin cultivar created by heavy-ion irradiation.Breeding science · 2026Article
- Identification of Triploid Plants in Seed-Derived Progeny of Cultivated Olive.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- LAYLA: development of a comprehensive and cross-sample program for detecting structural variants and its application to citrus cultivars.Breeding science · 2025Article
- InDel Markers for Identifying Interspecific Hybrid Offspring of Apple and Pear.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development of Pollen Parent Cultivar-Specific SCAR Markers and a Multiplex SCAR-PCR System for Discrimination between Pollen Parent and Seed Parent in Citrus.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- InDel and SCoT Markers for Genetic Diversity Analysis in a Citrus Collection from the Western Caucasus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Efficient method for generating citrus hybrids with polyembryonic Satsuma mandarin as the female parent.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We previously developed insertion-deletion (InDel) markers that distinguish three genotypes (two homozygous and one heterozygous) of diverse citrus cultivars. These InDel markers were codominant and could be clearly detected by using simple agarose gel electrophoresis. We sought to establish a method for cultivar identification using these 28 InDel markers to genotype 31 citrus cultivars. The results revealed that a minimum of 6 markers were required to identify individuals using the three-genotype classification method. Furthermore, we found that a simple method for distinguishing between two genotypes (homozygous and heterozygous) could be used to identify individuals using a minimum of 7 markers. Our findings provide a basis for the development of simple and rapid citrus cultivar identification methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.