Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35087256›Full record

ReviewLab animal2022

A practical guide to setting up pig models for cardiovascular catheterization, electrophysiological assessment and heart disease research.

Dominik Schüttler, Philipp Tomsits, Christina Bleyer, Julia Vlcek, Valerie Pauly, Nora Hesse, Moritz Sinner, Daphne Merkus, Jules Hamers, Stefan Kääb and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Lab animal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Dominik Schüttler *Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2546-5862
Philipp Tomsits *Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Christina Bleyer *Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Julia VlcekMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Valerie PaulyMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Nora HesseMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Moritz SinnerMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Daphne MerkusDZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Munich, Munich Heart Alliance (MHA), Munich, Germany.
Jules HamersDZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Munich, Munich Heart Alliance (MHA), Munich, Germany.
Stefan KääbMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Sebastian ClaussMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, LMU Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany. Sebastian.Clauss@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5675-6128
LMU Klinikum · DEErasmus MC · NLGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past years, the use of large animals has become increasingly interesting in translational research, to bridge the gap between basic research in rodents and targeted therapies in humans. Pigs are highly valued in cardiovascular research because of their anatomical, hemodynamic and electrophysiological features, which closely resemble those of humans. For studying these aspects in swine, cardiac catheterization techniques are essential procedures. Although cardiac catheterization seems to be comparatively easy in pigs as human equipment can be used to perform the procedure, there are some pitfalls. Here we provide a detailed protocol to guide the reader through different aspects of cardiac catheterization in pigs. We suggest an approach for safe intubation and extubation, provide tips for perioperative and postoperative management of the animals and guide the reader through different experimental steps, including sheath insertion. We also describe the procedures for basic electrophysiological assessment of conduction properties and atrial fibrillation induction, hemodynamic assessment via pressure-volume loops, right heart and left heart catheterization and the development of a myocardial infarction model by balloon occlusion. This protocol was developed in Landrace pigs and can be adapted to other pig breeds or other large animal species. This protocol requires approximately six and a half working hours in total and should be performed by researchers with previous experience in large animal experimentation and in the presence of a veterinarian.

Indexed as

Heart DiseasesMyocardial InfarctionAnimalsCardiac CatheterizationDisease Models, AnimalSwine

Identifiers

PMID35087256
OpenAlexW4210468558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.