ArticleScientific reports2022
Copy number alterations analysis of primary tumor tissue and circulating tumor cells from patients with early-stage triple negative breast cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mitochondrial dynamics: A promising tool for personalized TNBC management.Genes & diseases · 2026Review
- Identification of actionable targets using DEPArray-based sorting of pure carcinoma and stromal populations from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues followed by shallow whole-genome sequencing.The Journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Clinicopathological features of breast cancer in Ukrainian women with BRCA1 c.181T>G (p.Cys61Gly) variant: a case series.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Phenotypic Characterization and Sorting of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) Using a Digital Image-Based Sorter.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Dysfunctional mismatch repair in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Article
- Whole-exome profiles of inflammatory breast cancer and pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Low-pass whole genome sequencing of circulating tumor cells to evaluate chromosomal instability in triple-negative breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Cellular residual disease (CRD) in early breast cancer -Expanding the concept of minimal residual disease monitoring?The journal of liquid biopsy · 2024Review
- Molecular Profiling of Circulating Tumour Cells and Circulating Tumour DNA: Complementary Insights from a Single Blood Sample Utilising the ParsortixCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2024Review
- Review
- BRCA1/2 variants and copy number alterations status in non familial triple negative breast cancer and high grade serous ovarian cancer.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by clinical aggressiveness, lack of recognized target therapy, and a dismal patient prognosis. Several studies addressed genomic changes occurring during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) focusing on somatic variants, but without including copy number alterations (CNAs). We analyzed CNA profiles of 31 TNBC primary tumor samples before and after NAC and of 35 single circulating tumor cells (CTCs) collected prior, during and after treatment by using next-generation sequencing targeted profile and low-pass whole genome sequencing, respectively. In pre-treatment tissue samples, the most common gains occurred on chromosomes 1, 2 and 8, and SOX11 and MYC resulted the most altered genes. Notably, amplification of MSH2 (4/4 versus 0/12, p < 0.01) and PRDM1 and deletion of PAX3 (4/4 versus 1/12, p < 0.01) significantly characterized primary tumors of patients with pathological complete response. All patients with paired pre- and post-NAC samples reported a change in post-treatment CNAs compared to baseline, despite they showed at least one common alteration. CNAs detected after treatment involved genes within druggable pathways such as EGFR, cell cycle process and Ras signaling. In two patients, CTCs shared more alterations with residual rather than primary tumor involving genes such as MYC, BCL6, SOX2, FGFR4. The phylogenetic analysis of CTCs within a single patient revealed NAC impact on tumor evolution, suggesting a selection of driver events under treatment pressure. In conclusion, our data showed how chemoresistance might arise early from treatment-induced selection of clones already present in the primary tumor, and that the characterization of CNAs on single CTCs informs on cancer evolution and potential druggable targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.