Trial reportScientific reports2022
Assessment of 5-year outcomes of life satisfaction in survivors after rehabilitation programs: a multicenter clinical trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02787720 (Effects of Varied Rehabilitation Techniques on Survivors of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of Varied Rehabilitation Techniques on Survivors of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac Rehabilitation Using the Family-Centered Empowerment Model is Effective in Improving Long-term Mortality in Patients with Myocardial Infarction: A 10-year Follow-Up Randomized Clinical Trial.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2024Trial
- Surrogate resilience and clinical titration of presence in the open intensive care unit: a systematic narrative synthesis.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- The Effect of Continuous Care Program on the Self-Efficacy of Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: A Randomized Control Trial.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using a rehabilitation program for the survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) could be one of the important and fundamental steps to improve the pulmonary function and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients. This study was carried out to evaluate the effect of two rehabilitation techniques (Family-Based Empowerment Model (FECM)/Continuing Care Model (CCM), or both of them) on pulmonary function, and HRQoL in ARDS survivors. From December 2009 to June 2016, ARDS survivors from mixed medical-surgical ICUs at four academic teaching hospitals in Tehran, Iran, were randomly assigned to one of three intervention groups (A, B, or C) or a control group (D). Pre- and post-interventions, pulmonary functions and HRQoL status of patients in all groups were collected 48 times via clinical measurements and various questionnaires during 5 years of follow-up. Significantly improvement was seen in the intervention groups compared to the control group, and the greatest benefit was observed in patients who received mixed of FCEM and CCM rehabilitation techniques. Co-administration of FCEM and CCM can improve pulmonary function as well as the life satisfaction of ARDS survivors. As a result, the execution of the empowerment model by nurses is recommended for ARDS survivors and the participation of their families at the same time.Trial registration: NCT02787720 (ClinicalTrial.gov, 24/05/2016).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.