ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2022
The small world coefficient 4.8 ± 1 optimizes information processing in 2D neuronal networks.
Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic functional connectivity in borderline personality disorder: associations with trauma, emotion regulation and symptom severity.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026Article
- Looking for a Straw in a Haystack by Bridging the Cracks Between Individual Judgments: Narrowing the Knowledge Gap To Anticipate Surprises by Transforming Risk Assessors' Small Worlds Into Large Worlds.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026Article
- Nano-Topography Enhanced Topological-Cell-Analysis in Radiation-Therapy.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Review
- The role of elasticity on adhesion and clustering of neurons on soft surfaces.Communications biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Small world networks have recently attracted much attention because of their unique properties. Mounting evidence suggests that communication is optimized in networks with a small world topology. However, despite the relevance of the argument, little is known about the effective enhancement of information in similar graphs. Here, we provide a quantitative estimate of the efficiency of small world networks. We used a model of the brain in which neurons are described as agents that integrate the signals from other neurons and generate an output that spreads in the system. We then used the Shannon Information Entropy to decode those signals and compute the information transported in the grid as a function of its small-world-ness ([Formula: see text]), of the length ([Formula: see text]) and frequency ([Formula: see text]) of the originating stimulus. In numerical simulations in which [Formula: see text] was varied between [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] we found that, for certain values of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], communication is enhanced up to [Formula: see text] times compared to unstructured systems of the same size. Moreover, we found that the information processing capacity of a system steadily increases with [Formula: see text] until the value [Formula: see text], independently on [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. After this threshold, the performance degrades with [Formula: see text] and there is no convenience in increasing indefinitely the number of active links in the system. Supported by the findings of the work and in analogy with the exergy in thermodynamics, we introduce the concept of exordic systems: a system is exordic if it is topologically biased to transmit information efficiently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.