Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35087016›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2022

Feasibility of Using a Portable MyotonPRO Device to Quantify the Elastic Properties of Skeletal Muscle.

Ya-Peng Li, Chun-Long Liu, Zhi-Jie Zhang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06446258 (Assessment of the Impact of Soft Tissue Mobilization on the Scar in Patients After Cesarean Section), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06446258 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of the Impact of Soft Tissue Mobilization on the Scar in Patients After Cesarean Section

TypeinterventionalSponsorNicolaus Copernicus UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsCesarean Section ComplicationsArmsManual therapy (myofascial release, soft tissue mobilization)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Novel insight into the site-specificity of Hegu (LI4): morphological, biomechanical, and histological analyses.Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ya-Peng LiRehabilitation Therapy Center, Henan Province Orthopedic Hospital, Luoyang, Henan, China (mainland).
Chun-Long LiuClinical College of Acupuncture, Moxibustion, and Rehabilitation, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).
Zhi-Jie ZhangRehabilitation Therapy Center, Henan Province Orthopedic Hospital, Luoyang, Henan, China (mainland).
Luoyang Orthopedic-Traumatological Hospital of Henan Province · CNGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aims of this study were to (1) calculate the correlation between different tensile force levels and corresponding muscle stiffness both in vitro and in vivo; (2) determine whether muscle stiffness assessed using a MyotonPRO myotonometer can be used to accurately estimate muscle activity level; and (3) evaluate the inter-operator reliability of MyotonPRO-based measurement in assessing biceps brachii muscle (BBM) stiffness. MATERIAL AND METHODS In Experiment I, muscle stiffness, as measured using the MyotonPRO, was obtained at 0 N, 2 N, 4 N, 6 N, 8 N, and 10 N of applied force on 6 fresh medial gastrocnemius muscle specimens. In Experiment II, 11 healthy subjects were recruited. BBM stiffness, assessed by the same device, was obtained at different tensile force levels, from 0 to 50% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). For the reliability test, the score for each subject was quantified by 2 operators (I and II), thrice, at 30-minute intervals on the same day. RESULTS A strong correlation was found between the different tensile force levels, which corresponded to muscle stiffness in vitro (r=0.71-0.95, all P<0.05). In vivo, muscle stiffness increased linearly with an increase of the tensile force levels from 0 to 50% of MVC (r=0.99, P=0.00) and there was a significant difference in BBM stiffness among the incremental isometric tasks (F [1.76, 17.60]=91.52, P=0.00). The inter-operator reliability for the measurement of BBM stiffness was good (ICC=0.86). CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that muscle stiffness measured using the MyotonPRO is strongly related to muscle activity level and that the MyotonPRO is a feasible tool for quantifying BBM stiffness as well as for quantifying changes in MVC levels.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsChickensElasticityEquipment DesignFeasibility StudiesHumansModels, AnimalMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalMuscle TonusReference ValuesReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID35087016
PMCPMC8805342
OpenAlexW3215012344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.