Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35086949›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2022

Changes in T-cell subsets and clonal repertoire during chemoimmunotherapy with pembrolizumab and paclitaxel or capecitabine for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

Brie Chun, Joanna Pucilowska, ShuChing Chang, Isaac Kim, Benjamin Nikitin, Yoshinobu Koguchi, William L Redmond, Brady Bernard, Venkatesh Rajamanickam, Nathan Polaske and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Circulating CD28Journal of translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. T-cell repertoire diversity: friend or foe for protective antitumor response?Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Brie ChunEarle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7520-8365
Joanna PucilowskaKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
ShuChing ChangMedical Data Research Center, Providence St Joseph Health, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Isaac KimEarle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Benjamin NikitinEarle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Yoshinobu KoguchiEarle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.
William L RedmondEarle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2572-1731
Brady BernardEarle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Venkatesh RajamanickamEarle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Nathan PolaskeAdaptive Biotechnologies Corp, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Paul A FieldsAdaptive Biotechnologies Corp, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Valerie ConradEarle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Mark SchmidtEarle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Walter J UrbaEarle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Alison K ConlinEarle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Heather L McArthurDepartment of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
David B PageEarle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA david.page2@providence.org.ORCID 0000-0001-9264-4628
Providence Portland Medical Center · USAdaptive Biotechnologies (United States) · USOregon Health & Science University · USProvidence College · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChemoimmunotherapy is a standard treatment for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), however, the impacts of different chemotherapies on T-cell populations, which could correlate with clinical activity, are not known. Quantifying T-cell populations with flow cytometry and T-cell receptor (TCR) immunosequencing may improve our understanding of how chemoimmunotherapy affects T-cell subsets, and to what extent clonal shifts occur during treatment. TCR immunosequencing of intratumoral T cells may facilitate the identification and monitoring of putatively tumor-reactive T-cell clones within the blood.

methodsBlood and tumor biopsies were collected from patients with metastatic TNBC enrolled in a phase Ib clinical trial of first or second-line pembrolizumab with paclitaxel or capecitabine. Using identical biospecimen processing protocols, blood samples from a cohort of patients treated for early-stage breast cancer were obtained for comparison. Treatment-related immunological changes in peripheral blood and intratumoral T cells were characterized using flow cytometry and TCR immunosequencing. Clonal proliferation rates of T cells were compared based on intratumoral enrichment.

resultsWhen combined with pembrolizumab, paclitaxel and capecitabine resulted in similar time-dependent lymphodepletions across measured peripheral T-cell subsets. Their effects were more modest than that observed following curative-intent dose-dense anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (ddAC) (average fold-change in CD3

conclusionChemoimmunotherapy for metastatic TNBC with pembrolizumab and capecitabine or paclitaxel resulted in similar peripheral T-cell subset lymphodepletion without altering T-cell clonal diversity. Regression modeling methods are applicable in immune monitoring studies, such as this to identify the odds of novel T-cell clones emerging during treatment, and proliferation rates of tumor-enriched T-cell clones.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapecitabineFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLymphocyte DepletionMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPaclitaxelReceptors, Antigen, T-CellT-Lymphocyte SubsetsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsYoung AdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCapecitabineImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsPaclitaxelpembrolizumabReceptors, Antigen, T-Cellbiostatisticsbreast neoplasmsimmunotherapylymphocytesT-lymphocytestumor-infiltrating

Identifiers

PMID35086949
PMCPMC8796261
OpenAlexW4210382196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.