Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35086946›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2022

Phase I clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of ADP-A2M10 SPEAR T cells in patients with MAGE-A10

George R Blumenschein, Siddhartha Devarakonda, Melissa Johnson, Victor Moreno, Justin Gainor, Martin J Edelman, John V Heymach, Ramaswamy Govindan, Carlos Bachier, Bernard Doger de Spéville and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Adoptive cell therapy in lung cancer: progress, challenges, and prospects.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Adoptive cell therapies in thoracic malignancies: a comprehensive review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Engineering adoptive cell therapy for solid tumors.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The next generation of immunotherapies for lung cancers.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

George R BlumenscheinThoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA gblumens@mdanderson.org.
Siddhartha DevarakondaMedical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Melissa JohnsonLung Cancer Research and Drug Development, Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Victor MorenoSTART Madrid-FJD, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Justin GainorDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Martin J EdelmanHematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
John V HeymachThoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Ramaswamy GovindanMedical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Carlos BachierHematology, Sarah Cannon Center for Blood Cancer at TriStar Centennial, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Bernard Doger de SpévilleSTART Madrid-FJD, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Matthew J FrigaultBone Marrow Transplant & Cellular Therapy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Anthony J OlszanskiHematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Vincent K LamOncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Natalie HylandAdaptimmune, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK.
Jean-Marc NavenotAdaptimmune, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Svetlana FayngertsAdaptimmune, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Zohar WolchinskyAdaptimmune, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK.
Robyn BroadAdaptimmune, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK.
Dzmitry BatrakouAdaptimmune, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK.
Melissa M PentonyAdaptimmune, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK.
Joseph P SandersonAdaptimmune, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK.
Andrew GerryAdaptimmune, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK.
Diane MarksAdaptimmune, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jane BaiAdaptimmune, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Tom HoldichAdaptimmune, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK.
Elliot NorryAdaptimmune, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Paula M FracassoAdaptimmune, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1211-3304
Adaptimmune (United Kingdom) · GBFox Chase Cancer Center · USHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ESSarah Cannon · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · USHarvard University · USJohns Hopkins University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundADP-A2M10 specific peptide enhanced affinity receptor (SPEAR) T cells (ADP-A2M10) are genetically engineered autologous T cells that express a high-affinity melanoma-associated antigen A10 (MAGE-A10)-specific T-cell receptor (TCR) targeting MAGE-A10

methodsEligible patients were HLA-A*02 positive with advanced NSCLC expressing MAGE-A10. Patients underwent apheresis; T cells were isolated, transduced with a lentiviral vector containing the TCR targeting MAGE-A10, and expanded. Patients underwent lymphodepletion with varying doses/schedules of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide prior to receiving ADP-A2M10. ADP-A2M10 were administered at 0.08-0.12×10

resultsEleven patients (male, n=6; female, n=5) with NSCLC (adenocarcinoma, n=8; squamous cell carcinoma, n=3) were treated. Five, three, and three patients received cells in dose group 1, dose group 2, and dose group 3/expansion, respectively. The most frequently reported grade ≥3 adverse events were lymphopenia (n=11), leukopenia (n=10), neutropenia (n=8), anemia (n=6), thrombocytopenia (n=5), and hyponatremia (n=5). Three patients presented with cytokine release syndrome (grades 1, 2, and 4, respectively). One patient received the highest dose of lymphodepletion (fludarabine 30 mg/m

conclusionsADP-A2M10 demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and no evidence of toxicity related to off-target binding or alloreactivity. There was persistence of ADP-A2M10 in peripheral blood as well as ADP-A2M10 trafficking into the tumor. Given the discovery that MAGE-A10 and MAGE-A4 expression frequently overlap, this clinical program closed as trials with SPEAR T cells targeting MAGE-A4 are ongoing.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveAgedAntigens, NeoplasmCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleGenetic EngineeringHumansLung NeoplasmsLymphocyte DepletionMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm ProteinsReceptors, Antigen, T-CellT-LymphocytesAntigens, NeoplasmMAGE-A10 antigenNeoplasm ProteinsReceptors, Antigen, T-Cellcell engineeringclinical trials as topic

Identifiers

PMID35086946
PMCPMC8796260
OpenAlexW4210715335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.