Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35086926›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society2022

Symptom burden and quality of life with chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer: the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup-Symptom Benefit Study.

Yeh Chen Lee, Madeleine T King, Rachel L O'Connell, Anne Lanceley, Florence Joly, Felix Hilpert, Alison Davis, Felicia T Roncolato, Aikou Okamoto, Jane Bryce and 13 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of aromatherapy on chemotherapy-related symptom management.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  2. Optimising ovarian cancer care: An embedded mixed methods evaluation of a national nurse-led telehealth program.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Environment, lifestyle, and cancer in women.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Symptom burden, palliative care knowledge, and palliative care needs in advanced gynecological cancer patients in Korea.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  10. Heterogeneity and treatment landscape of ovarian carcinoma.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. "It doesn't really apply to what I'm going through": a mixed-methods study of barriers to palliative care among patients with advanced ovarian cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 15 institutions in 11 countries.

Yeh Chen LeeAustralia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group (ANZGOG), Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2009-8263
Madeleine T KingUniversity of Sydney, Quality of Life Office of Psycho-Oncology Research Group (PoCoG), Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Rachel L O'ConnellUniversity of Sydney, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Anne LanceleyUCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
Florence JolyGINECO-Group d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens, Paris, France.
Felix HilpertArbeitsgesmeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Studiengruppe (AGO) und North-Eastern German Society of Gynecologcial Oncology (NOGGO), Kiel, Germany.
Alison DavisAustralia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group (ANZGOG), Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Felicia T RoncolatoAustralia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group (ANZGOG), Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Aikou OkamotoJapanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG), Tokyo, Japan.
Jane BryceIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Campania, Italy.
Paul DonnellanCancer Trials Ireland, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland.
Amit M OzaPrincess Margaret Consortium (PMHC), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Elisabeth Avall-LundqvistNordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology (NSGO), Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jonathan S BerekCooperative Gynecologic Oncology Investigators (COGI), Stanford, California, USA.
Jonathan A LedermannThe Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, NCRI UK, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3799-3539
Dominique BertonGINECO-Group d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens, Paris, France.
Jalid SehouliArbeitsgesmeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Studiengruppe (AGO) und North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology (NOGGO), Berlin, Germany.
Amanda FeeneyThe Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, NCRI UK, London, UK.
Marie-Christine KaminskyGINECO-Group d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens, Paris, France.
Katrina DiamanteUniversity of Sydney, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Martin R StocklerUniversity of Sydney, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Michael L FriedlanderAustralia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group (ANZGOG), Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia m.friedlander@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3090-795X
GCIG Symptom Benefit Group
The University of Sydney · AUCancer Research UK · GBNord-Ostdeutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologische Onkologie · DECanberra Hospital · AUCentre François Baclesse · FRInstitut de Cancérologie de Lorraine · FRInstitut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest · FRJikei University School of Medicine · JPLinköping University · SEStanford University · USSt. John Medical Center · USUniversity College Hospital · GBUniversity Hospital Galway · IEUniversity of Toronto · CAUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG)-Symptom Benefit Study was designed to evaluate the effects of chemotherapy on symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in women having chemotherapy for platinum resistant/refractory recurrent ovarian cancer (PRR-ROC) and potentially platinum sensitive with ≥3 lines of chemotherapy (PPS-ROC ≥3).

methodsParticipants completed the Measure of Ovarian Cancer Symptoms and Treatment (MOST) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire QLQ-C30 questionnaires at baseline and every 3-4 weeks until progression. Participants were classified symptomatic if they rated ≥4 of 10 in at least one-third of symptoms in the MOST index. Improvement in MOST was defined as two consecutive scores of ≤3 in at least half of the symptomatic items at baseline. Improvement in HRQL was defined as two consecutive scores ≥10 points above baseline in the QLQ-C30 summary score scale (range 0-100).

resultsOf 948 participants enrolled, 910 (96%) completed baseline questionnaires: 546 with PRR-ROC and 364 with PPS-ROC ≥3. The proportions of participants symptomatic at baseline as per MOST indexes were: abdominal 54%, psychological 53%, and disease- or treatment-related 35%. Improvement was reported in MOST indexes: abdominal 40%, psychological 35%, and disease- or treatment-related 38%. Median time to improvement in abdominal symptoms occurred earlier for PRR-ROC than for PPS-ROC ≥3 (4 vs 6 weeks, p=0.044); median duration of improvement was also similar (9.0 vs 11.7 weeks, p=0.65). Progression-free survival was longer among those with improvement in abdominal symptoms than in those without (median 7.2 vs 2.5 months, p<0.0001). Improvements in HRQL were reported by 77/448 (17%) with PRR-ROC and 61/301 (20%) with PPS-ROC ≥3 (p=0.29), and 102/481 (21%) of those with abdominal symptoms at baseline.

conclusionOver 50% of participants reported abdominal and psychological symptoms at baseline. Of those, 40% reported an improvement within 2 months of starting chemotherapy. Approximately one in six participants reported an improvement in HRQL. Symptom monitoring and supportive care is important as chemotherapy palliated less than half of symptomatic participants.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsQuality of LifeAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansSurveys and Questionnairesmedical oncologyovarian cancerquality of life (PRO)/palliative care

Identifiers

PMID35086926
PMCPMC9185817
OpenAlexW4210316197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.