Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35086905›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022

Left Motor δ Oscillations Reflect Asynchrony Detection in Multisensory Speech Perception.

Emmanuel Biau, Benjamin G Schultz, Thomas C Gunter, Sonja A Kotz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Emmanuel BiauDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZA, United Kingdom e.biau@liverpool.ac.uk sonja.kotz@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-7631-9013
Benjamin G SchultzBasic and Applied NeuroDynamics Laboratory, Department of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht 6200 MD, The Netherlands.
Thomas C GunterDepartment of Neuropsychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig 04103, Germany.
Sonja A KotzBasic and Applied NeuroDynamics Laboratory, Department of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht 6200 MD, The Netherlands e.biau@liverpool.ac.uk sonja.kotz@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Maastricht University · NLMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences · DEUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During multisensory speech perception, slow δ oscillations (∼1-3 Hz) in the listener's brain synchronize with the speech signal, likely engaging in speech signal decomposition. Notable fluctuations in the speech amplitude envelope, resounding speaker prosody, temporally align with articulatory and body gestures and both provide complementary sensations that temporally structure speech. Further, δ oscillations in the left motor cortex seem to align with speech and musical beats, suggesting their possible role in the temporal structuring of (quasi)-rhythmic stimulation. We extended the role of δ oscillations to audiovisual asynchrony detection as a test case of the temporal analysis of multisensory prosody fluctuations in speech. We recorded Electroencephalograph (EEG) responses in an audiovisual asynchrony detection task while participants watched videos of a speaker. We filtered the speech signal to remove verbal content and examined how visual and auditory prosodic features temporally (mis-)align. Results confirm (1) that participants accurately detected audiovisual asynchrony, and (2) increased δ power in the left motor cortex in response to audiovisual asynchrony. The difference of δ power between asynchronous and synchronous conditions predicted behavioral performance, and (3) decreased δ-β coupling in the left motor cortex when listeners could not accurately map visual and auditory prosodies. Finally, both behavioral and neurophysiological evidence was altered when a speaker's face was degraded by a visual mask. Together, these findings suggest that motor δ oscillations support asynchrony detection of multisensory prosodic fluctuation in speech.

Indexed as

Speech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAuditory PerceptionElectroencephalographyHumansPhotic StimulationSpeechVisual Perceptionaudio-visual asynchronymotor cortexmultisensory speechprosodyδ oscillations

Identifiers

PMID35086905
PMCPMC8936602
OpenAlexW4210403017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.