ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2021
Safety and Neurologic Recovery of L2 Nerve Root Sacrificed in Total En Bloc Spondylectomy Involving the L2 Vertebra.
Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of outcomes between total en bloc spondylectomy and palliative spinal surgery in metastatic spinal tumor patients: propensity score matching analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe L2 nerve root is considered part of the lumbar plexus that innervates the iliopsoas (IP) and quadricep muscles (Qd). Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) at the L2 vertebra requires bilateral nerve root transection to facilitate surgical dissection and vertebral body removal. Information regarding neurological function recovery of the IP and Qd in patients with muscle weakness before TES is lacking. We aimed to report the neurological recovery of IP and Qd after TES involving the L2 vertebra in preoperative lower extremity weakness in spinal tumor patients.
methodsWe prospectively recorded all L2-involved spinal tumor patients undergoing TES between January 2018 and November 2020. As a primary outcome, we recorded the Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) grade of the IP and Qd preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the Frankel neurological status, sensation impairment, and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score.
resultsFrom 8 TES-involving L2 patients, 6 (4 males) met the inclusion criteria. One patient had first-grade deterioration of the Qd MMT immediately postoperatively. All patients could ambulate independently 6 months after surgery. Five patients required follow-up for more than 1 year and could walk without any gait aids. All patients had persistent anterior groin and bilateral thigh numbness until the final follow-up.
conclusionNeurological recovery of the IP and Qd muscles as measured by MMT can occur within 6 months of bilateral L2 nerve root transection. Bilateral L2 nerve root sacrifice can have acceptable neurological outcomes and recovery, even in patients with preoperative IP and Qd weakness. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.