Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35086802›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice2023

Medication reconciliation

Monica Hermann, Markus Dreetz Holt, Reidun L S Kjome, Arna Teigen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Monica HermannDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences - Stord Campus, Stord, Norway monica.hermann@hvl.no.ORCID 0000-0002-8006-3591
Markus Dreetz HoltWestern Norway Hospital Pharmacy in Stavanger, Stavanger, Rogaland, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9586-6194
Reidun L S KjomeCentre for Pharmacy, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9454-5188
Arna TeigenWestern Norway Hospital Pharmacy in Stavanger, Stavanger, Rogaland, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8085-7877
Stavanger University Hospital · NOUniversity of Bergen · NOWestern Norway University of Applied Sciences · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate whether it was possible to decrease the time used for medication reconciliation (MR) in the emergency department without compromising quality. A more efficient method will enable more patients to receive MR as early as possible after admission to hospital.

methodsPotential key factors for improvement of the standard method of MR by clinical pharmacists were identified through an observational period. A revised method was developed, focusing on decreasing time spent on the patient interview by use of a condensed checklist and probing questions based on information from a prescription database. Non-inferior quality (proportion of patients with at least one identified medication discrepancy and number of identified medication discrepancies per patient) of the revised method was evaluated using a before-after study design with 200 individuals in each group. Non-inferiority limit was set at 10%. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical evaluation of the difference in time use per patient in the MR process between the before and after group.

resultsMean age of the included patients was 78 years in both groups. The time used for MR in the after group was 34% shorter (37 min vs 56 min, p<0.0001) compared with the before group. The revised method was shown to be non-inferior compared with the original method with respect to the proportion of patients with at least one identified discrepancy (81%, 95% CI 76% to 86% vs 79%, 95% CI 73% to 84%). Also, non-inferiority was shown for the number of identified discrepancies per patient, where the average number of discrepancies per patient was 1.9 (95% CI 1.7 to 2.1) in both groups.

conclusionThis study showed that it was possible to speed up the MR process without compromising its effectiveness in identifying medication discrepancies.

Indexed as

Medication ErrorsMedication ReconciliationAgedControlled Before-After StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalHumansPatient Admissionemergency medicinehospitalmedication systemspharmacy servicequality of health caresafety

Identifiers

PMID35086802
PMCPMC10647851
OpenAlexW4210817391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.