Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35086603›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2022

Whole-genome sequencing of

Luqi Wang, Jinghui Yang, Liang Chen, Weibing Wang, Fangyou Yu, Haiyan Xiong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Fluoroquinolone resistance and mutation profiles inFrontiers in public health · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Decoding EcuadorianBiomedicines · 2025
    Article
  11. Drug resistance profile ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Whole-Genome Sequencing ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Luqi WangDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai200032, China.
Jinghui YangTuberculosis Microbiology Laboratory, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai200082, China.
Liang ChenHackensack-Meridian Health Center for Discovery and Innovation, Nutley, NJ, USA.
Weibing WangDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai200032, China.
Fangyou YuTuberculosis Microbiology Laboratory, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai200082, China.
Haiyan XiongDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai200032, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6487-3909
Fudan University · CNHackensack Meridian Health · USShanghai Public Health Clinical Center · CNShanghai Pulmonary Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has shown tremendous potential in rapid diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB). In the current study, we performed WGS on drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates obtained from Shanghai (n = 137) and Russia (n = 78). We aimed to characterise the underlying and high-frequency novel drug-resistance-conferring mutations, and also create valuable combinations of resistance mutations with high predictive sensitivity to predict multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/XDR-TB) phenotype using a bootstrap method. Most strains belonged to L2.2, L4.2, L4.4, L4.5 and L4.8 lineages. We found that WGS could predict 82.07% of phenotypically drug-resistant domestic strains. The prediction sensitivity for rifampicin (RIF), isoniazid (INH), ethambutol (EMB), streptomycin (STR), ofloxacin (OFL), amikacin (AMK) and capreomycin (CAP) was 79.71%, 86.30%, 76.47%, 88.37%, 83.33%, 70.00% and 70.00%, respectively. The mutation combination with the highest sensitivity for MDR prediction was rpoB S450L + rpoB H445A/P + katG S315T + inhA I21T + inhA S94A, with a sensitivity of 92.17% (0.8615, 0.9646), and the mutation combination with highest sensitivity for XDR prediction was rpoB S450L + katG S315T + gyrA D94G + rrs A1401G, with a sensitivity of 92.86% (0.8158, 0.9796). The molecular information presented here will be of particular value for the rapid clinical detection of MDR- and XDR-TB isolates through laboratory diagnosis.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsChinaDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialGenome, BacterialHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMutationMycobacterium tuberculosisPhylogenyRussiaSensitivity and SpecificityTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantWhole Genome SequencingAntitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsDrug resistancepredictionsensitivityspecificitytuberculosiswhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID35086603
PMCPMC8851352
OpenAlexW4205618142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.