Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35086549›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

Creating a win-win for the health system and health Profession's education: a direct observation clinical experience with feedback iN real-time (DOCENT) for low acuity patients in the emergency department.

Alison S Clay, Erin R Leiman, Brent Jason Theiling, Yao Song, Blanca Blanca Iris Padilla, Nicholas M Hudak, Ann Michelle Hartman, Jeffrey M Hoder, Kathleen A Waite, Hui-Jie Lee and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alison S ClayDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, 8 Searle Center Drive, TSCHE 1074, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. alison.clay@duke.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3191-5345
Erin R LeimanDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Brent Jason TheilingDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Yao SongDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Blanca Blanca Iris PadillaSchool of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Nicholas M HudakDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Ann Michelle HartmanSchool of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Jeffrey M HoderDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Kathleen A WaiteDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, 8 Searle Center Drive, TSCHE 1074, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Hui-Jie LeeDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Edward G BuckleyDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, USA.
Duke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical education across the professions is challenged by a lack of recognition for faculty and pressure for patient throughput and revenue generation. These pressures may reduce direct observation of patient care provided by students, a requirement for both billing student-involved services and assessing competence. These same pressures may also limit opportunities for interprofessional education and collaboration.

methodsAn interprofessional group of faculty collaborated in a sequential quality improvement project to identify the best patients and physical location for a student teaching clinic. Patient chief complaint, use of resources, length of stay, estimated severity of illness and student participation and evaluation of the clinic was tracked.

resultsClinic Optimization and Patient Care: Five hundred and thirty-two emergency department (ED) patients were seen in the first 19 months of the clinic. A clinic located near the ED allowed for patients with higher emergency severity index and greater utilization of imaging. Patients had similar or lower lengths of stay and higher satisfaction than patients who remained in the ED (p < 0.0001). In the second clinic location, from October 2016-June 2019, 644 patients were seen with a total of 667 concerns; the most common concern was musculoskeletal (50.1%). Student Interprofessional Experience: A total of 991 students participated in the clinic: 68.3% (n = 677) medical students, 10.1% (n = 100) physician assistant students, 9.7% (n = 96) undergraduate nursing students, 9.1% (n = 90) physical therapy students, and 2.8% (n = 28) nurse practitioner students. The majority (74.5%, n = 738) of student participants worked with students from other professions. More than 90% of students reported that faculty set a positive learning environment respectful of students. However, 20% of students reported that faculty could improve provision of constructive feedback. Direct Observation: Direct observation of core entrustable professional activities for medical students was possible. Senior medical students were more likely to be observed generating a differential diagnosis or management plan than first year medical students.

conclusionsCreation of a DOCENT clinic in the emergency department provided opportunities for interprofessional education and observation of student clinical skills, enriching student experience without compromising patient care.

Indexed as

Education, Nursing, BaccalaureateStudents, MedicalStudents, NursingEmergency Service, HospitalFeedbackHealth OccupationsHumansInterprofessional RelationsDirect observationEntrustable professional activitiesFeedbackHealth professions educationInterprofessional collaborationLearning climateUndergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID35086549
PMCPMC8796635
OpenAlexW4210577432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.