Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35086545›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Indiana community health workers: challenges and opportunities for workforce development.

Natalia M Rodriguez, Yumary Ruiz, Ashley H Meredith, Carlyn Kimiecik, Omolola A Adeoye-Olatunde, Lynnet Francesca Kimera, Jasmine D Gonzalvo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ARCHWAy: an innovative educational program advancing the public health workforce.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Natalia M RodriguezCollege of Health and Human Sciences, Department of Public Health, Purdue University, 812 W. State Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Yumary RuizCollege of Health and Human Sciences, Department of Public Health, Purdue University, 812 W. State Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Ashley H MeredithCollege of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University Center for Health Equity and Innovation, 640 Eskenazi Ave, Fifth Third Bank FOB, 3rd Floor, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Carlyn KimiecikCollege of Health and Human Sciences, Department of Public Health, Purdue University, 812 W. State Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Omolola A Adeoye-OlatundeCollege of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University Center for Health Equity and Innovation, 640 Eskenazi Ave, Fifth Third Bank FOB, 3rd Floor, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Lynnet Francesca KimeraCollege of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University Center for Health Equity and Innovation, 640 Eskenazi Ave, Fifth Third Bank FOB, 3rd Floor, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Jasmine D GonzalvoCollege of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University Center for Health Equity and Innovation, 640 Eskenazi Ave, Fifth Third Bank FOB, 3rd Floor, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. jgonzalv@purdue.edu.

Funding

Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Management: Improving Submissions and Study Conduct in the Human Subjects Research Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002529 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOE, SHARON M, WIEHE, SARAH ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$27.2M
Community-based Participatory Design of an HPV rapid diagnostic test for cervical cancer screening in South FloridaK01CA241073 · NCI · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI RODRIGUEZ, NATALIA MARIA · 2019 to 2023
$916k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002529NCI NIH HHS K01 CA241073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn interest in, and the need for, Community Health Workers (CHWs) in the United States is growing exponentially. CHWs possess a unique ability to relate to and build trust with communities in order to improve clinical outcomes, while building individual and community capacity. Given their critical role in addressing social determinants of health, expanding the CHW workforce is crucial. However, creating CHW jobs, facilitating training and certification, and establishing sustainable financing models to support this workforce has been challenging.

methodsA mixed-methods study consisting of an online survey and focus group discussions assessed the strengths, practices, and challenges to CHW workforce sustainability and expansion in the state of Indiana, including perspectives from both CHWs and employers.

resultsAcross 8 topics, mixed data analysis revealed 28 findings that were both complementary and unique across focus group and survey results. Results highlighted CHW skills and attributes, illustrated the recruitment and hiring process, and provided insight into measuring outcomes and outputs. Findings also indicated a need to build position validation, professional development, and billing and reimbursement capacity.

conclusionBuilding and sustaining the CHW workforce will require creating an evidence base of roles and impact, increasing awareness of existing reimbursement mechanisms, and sharing best practices across employer organizations to promote optimal recruitment, training, supervision, career development, and funding strategies.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersStaff DevelopmentCertificationHumansIndianaUnited StatesWorkforceCapacity buildingCommunity health workersIndianaWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID35086545
PMCPMC8792135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.